mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Collective Alignment in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Disentangling Bias from Cooperation via Statistical Physics

arXiv 2605.10528 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cond-mat.stat-mech cs.CL cs.MAcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the emergent collective dynamics of LLM-based multi-agent systems on a 2D square lattice and present a model-agnostic statistical-physics method to disentangle social conformity from intrinsic bias, compute critical exponents, and probe the collective behavior and possible phase transitions of multi-agent systems. In our framework, each node of an L!×!L lattice hosts an identical LLM agent holding a binary state (+1/-1, mapped to yes/no) and updating it by querying the model conditioned on the four nearest-neighbor states. The sampler temperature T serves as the sole control parameter. Across three open-weight models (llama3.1:8b, phi4-mini:3.8b, mistral:7b), we measure magnetization and susceptibility under a global-flip protocol designed to probe mathbbZ2 symmetry. All models display temperature-driven order-disorder crossovers and susceptibility peaks; finite-size scaling on even-L lattices yields effective exponents γ/nu whose values are model-dependent, close to but incompatible with the 2D Ising universality class (γ/nu=7/4). Our method enables the extraction of effective β-weighted couplings tildeJ(T) and fields tildeh(T), which serve as a measure of social conformity and intrinsic bias. In the models we analyzed, we found that collective alignment is dominated by an intrinsic bias (tildehggtildeJ) rather than by cooperative neighbor coupling, producing field-driven crossovers instead of genuine phase transitions. These effective parameters vary qualitatively across models, providing compact collective-behavior fingerprints for LLM agents and a quantitative diagnostic for the reliability of multi-agent consensus and collective alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Increasing intelligence in AI agents can worsen collective outcomes12 Mar
  2. 2024Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents25 Apr
  3. 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs29 Nov
  4. 2023Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents16 Nov

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  4. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
  5. 2024CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 32
  6. 2024When LLMs Play the Telephone Game: Cultural Attractors as Conceptual Tools to Evaluate LLMs in Multi-turn Settingscited by 17
  7. 2025The Bias is in the Details: An Assessment of Cognitive Bias in LLMscited by 10
  8. 2023Cooperative AI via Decentralized Commitment Devicescited by 7
  9. 2025Detailed balance in large language model-driven agentscited by 6
  10. 2025Learning Individual Behavior in Agent-Based Models with Graph Diffusion Networkscited by 4
  11. 2026Bias Beyond Borders: Political Ideology Evaluation and Steering in Multilingual LLMscited by 4
  12. 2025Source framing triggers systematic evaluation bias in Large Language Modelscited by 3
4 more
  1. 2025Reaching Agreement Among Reasoning LLM Agentscited by 3
  2. 2024More is More: Addition Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  3. 2026Profit is the Red Team: Stress-Testing Agents in Strategic Economic Interactionscited by 1
  4. 2026Karma Mechanisms for Decentralised, Cooperative Multi Agent Path Findingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Group size effects and collective misalignment in LLM multi-agent systems
  2. 2026Emergence of Biased Consensus in Multi-Agent LLM Debates
  3. 2026Graph-theoretic Agreement Framework for Multi-agent LLM Systems
  4. 2026Conformity Dynamics in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: The Roles of Topology and Self-Social Weighting
  5. 2026When Is Emergent Consensus Real? A Measured Coupling Gain and a Validity Diagnostic for LLM Agent Societies
  6. 2026Population Physics, Population Problems: Safety and Emergence in LLM Societies
  7. 2025LoopBench: Discovering Emergent Symmetry Breaking Strategies with LLM Swarms
  8. 2026Physics of Agents: Statistical Mechanics Predicts Collective Behavior of AI Agents