Reliable Statistical Guarantees for Conformal Predictors with Small Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surrogate models (including deep neural networks and other machine learning algorithms in supervised learning) are capable of approximating arbitrarily complex, high-dimensional input-output problems in science and engineering, but require a thorough data-agnostic uncertainty quantification analysis before these can be deployed for any safety-critical application. The standard approach for data-agnostic uncertainty quantification is to use conformal prediction (CP), a well-established framework to build uncertainty models with proven statistical guarantees that do not assume any shape for the error distribution of the surrogate model. However, since the classic statistical guarantee offered by CP is given in terms of bounds for the marginal coverage, for small calibration set sizes (which are frequent in realistic surrogate modelling that aims to quantify error at different regions), the potentially strong dispersion of the coverage distribution around its average negatively impacts the relevance of the uncertainty model's statistical guarantee, often obtaining coverages below the expected value, resulting in a less applicable framework. After providing a gentle presentation of uncertainty quantification for surrogate models for machine learning practitioners, in this paper we bridge the gap by proposing a new statistical guarantee that offers probabilistic information for the coverage of a single conformal predictor. We show that the proposed framework converges to the standard solution offered by CP for large calibration set sizes and, unlike the classic guarantee, still offers relevant information about the coverage of a conformal predictor for small data sizes. We validate the methodology in a suite of examples, and implement an open access software solution that can be used alongside common conformal prediction libraries to obtain uncertainty models that fulfil the new guarantee.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
14 of 39 references.
References · 14
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
- 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
- 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
- 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 270
- 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
- 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
- 2020Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learningcited by 27
- 2023The transformative potential of machine learning for experiments in fluid mechanicscited by 26
- 2023Generative learning for nonlinear dynamicscited by 22
- 2022Improving aircraft performance using machine learning: a reviewcited by 19
- 2022MAPIE: an open-source library for distribution-free uncertainty quantificationcited by 17
- 2024Towards certification: A complete statistical validation pipeline for supervised learning in industrycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.