mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalization Evaluation of Deep Stereo Matching Methods for UAV-Based Forestry Applications

arXiv 2512.03427 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous UAV forestry operations require robust depth estimation methods with strong cross-domain generalization. However, existing evaluations focus on urban and indoor scenarios, leaving a critical gap for specialized vegetation-dense environments. We present the first systematic zero-shot evaluation of eight state-of-the-art stereo methods--RAFT-Stereo, IGEV, IGEV++, BridgeDepth, StereoAnywhere, DEFOM (plus baseline methods ACVNet, PSMNet, TCstereo)--spanning iterative refinement, foundation model, and zero-shot adaptation paradigms. All methods are trained exclusively on Scene Flow and evaluated without fine-tuning on four standard benchmarks (ETH3D, KITTI 2012/2015, Middlebury) plus a novel 5,313-pair Canterbury forestry dataset captured with ZED Mini camera (1920x1080). Performance reveals scene-dependent patterns: foundation models excel on structured scenes (BridgeDepth: 0.23 px on ETH3D, 0.83-1.07 px on KITTI; DEFOM: 0.35-4.65 px across benchmarks), while iterative methods maintain cross-domain robustness (IGEV++: 0.36-6.77 px; IGEV: 0.33-21.91 px). Critical finding: RAFT-Stereo exhibits catastrophic ETH3D failure (26.23 px EPE, 98 percent error rate) due to negative disparity predictions, while performing normally on KITTI (0.90-1.11 px). Qualitative evaluation on Canterbury forestry dataset identifies DEFOM as the optimal gold-standard baseline for vegetation depth estimation, exhibiting superior depth smoothness, occlusion handling, and cross-domain consistency compared to IGEV++, despite IGEV++'s finer detail preservation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
  2. 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 486
  3. 2017End-to-End Learning of Geometry and Context for Deep Stereo Regressioncited by 359
  4. 2021RAFT-Stereo: Multilevel Recurrent Field Transforms for Stereo Matchingcited by 348
  5. 2022Unifying Flow, Stereo and Depth Estimationcited by 270
  6. 2019GA-Net: Guided Aggregation Net for End-to-end Stereo Matchingcited by 242
  7. 2022Practical Stereo Matching via Cascaded Recurrent Network with Adaptive Correlationcited by 197
  8. 2021The Temporal Opportunist: Self-Supervised Multi-Frame Monocular Depthcited by 190
  9. 2023Iterative Geometry Encoding Volume for Stereo Matchingcited by 188
  10. 2025FoundationStereo: Zero-Shot Stereo Matchingcited by 168
  11. 2018Real-time self-adaptive deep stereocited by 80
  12. 2022Learning to Generalize across Domains on Single Test Samplescited by 24
1 more
  1. 2014Pushbroom Stereo for High-Speed Navigation in Cluttered Environmentscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.