Generalization Evaluation of Deep Stereo Matching Methods for UAV-Based Forestry Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous UAV forestry operations require robust depth estimation methods with strong cross-domain generalization. However, existing evaluations focus on urban and indoor scenarios, leaving a critical gap for specialized vegetation-dense environments. We present the first systematic zero-shot evaluation of eight state-of-the-art stereo methods--RAFT-Stereo, IGEV, IGEV++, BridgeDepth, StereoAnywhere, DEFOM (plus baseline methods ACVNet, PSMNet, TCstereo)--spanning iterative refinement, foundation model, and zero-shot adaptation paradigms. All methods are trained exclusively on Scene Flow and evaluated without fine-tuning on four standard benchmarks (ETH3D, KITTI 2012/2015, Middlebury) plus a novel 5,313-pair Canterbury forestry dataset captured with ZED Mini camera (1920x1080). Performance reveals scene-dependent patterns: foundation models excel on structured scenes (BridgeDepth: 0.23 px on ETH3D, 0.83-1.07 px on KITTI; DEFOM: 0.35-4.65 px across benchmarks), while iterative methods maintain cross-domain robustness (IGEV++: 0.36-6.77 px; IGEV: 0.33-21.91 px). Critical finding: RAFT-Stereo exhibits catastrophic ETH3D failure (26.23 px EPE, 98 percent error rate) due to negative disparity predictions, while performing normally on KITTI (0.90-1.11 px). Qualitative evaluation on Canterbury forestry dataset identifies DEFOM as the optimal gold-standard baseline for vegetation depth estimation, exhibiting superior depth smoothness, occlusion handling, and cross-domain consistency compared to IGEV++, despite IGEV++'s finer detail preservation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 878
- 2018Pyramid Stereo Matching Networkcited by 486
- 2017End-to-End Learning of Geometry and Context for Deep Stereo Regressioncited by 359
- 2021RAFT-Stereo: Multilevel Recurrent Field Transforms for Stereo Matchingcited by 348
- 2022Unifying Flow, Stereo and Depth Estimationcited by 270
- 2019GA-Net: Guided Aggregation Net for End-to-end Stereo Matchingcited by 242
- 2022Practical Stereo Matching via Cascaded Recurrent Network with Adaptive Correlationcited by 197
- 2021The Temporal Opportunist: Self-Supervised Multi-Frame Monocular Depthcited by 190
- 2023Iterative Geometry Encoding Volume for Stereo Matchingcited by 188
- 2025FoundationStereo: Zero-Shot Stereo Matchingcited by 168
- 2018Real-time self-adaptive deep stereocited by 80
- 2022Learning to Generalize across Domains on Single Test Samplescited by 24
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Training Deep Stereo Matching Networks on Tree Branch Imagery: A Benchmark Study for Real-Time UAV Forestry Applicationscited by 0
- 2026Real-Time Branch-to-Tool Distance Estimation for Autonomous UAV Pruning: Benchmarking Five DEFOM-Stereo Variants from Simulation to Jetson Deploymentcited by 0
- 2026Advancing MLLM-based UAV Image Understanding and Reasoning: A Benchmark and a Training-Free Multi-Agent Systemcited by 0
- 2026Advancing MLLM-based UAV Image Understanding and Reasoning: A Benchmark and a Training-Free Multi-Agent System12 Aug 2026
- 2026Real-Time Branch-to-Tool Distance Estimation for Autonomous UAV Pruning: Benchmarking Five DEFOM-Stereo Variants from Simulation to Jetson Deployment27 Mar 2026
- 2026Training Deep Stereo Matching Networks on Tree Branch Imagery: A Benchmark Study for Real-Time UAV Forestry Applications23 Feb 2026