Idea-Gated Transformers: Enforcing Semantic Coherence via Differentiable Vocabulary Pruning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoregressive Language Models (LLMs) trained on Next-Token Prediction (NTP) often suffer from Topic Drift where the generation wanders away from the initial prompt due to a reliance on local associations rather than global planning. While scaling model size mitigates this, the fundamental myopia of the NTP objective remains. In this work, we introduce the Idea-Gated Transformer, a novel architecture that separates semantic planning from syntactic generation. We introduce an auxiliary Idea Head trained to predict the bag-of-words distribution for a future context window, creating a latent ``Concept Vector'' that actively gates the main vocabulary during generation. We propose a differentiable gating mechanism that suppresses semantically irrelevant tokens, effectively pruning the search space in real-time. Experiments on WikiText-103 demonstrate that while the Idea-Gated model achieves comparable validation perplexity to a standard GPT-2 baseline, it exhibits significantly superior Domain Retention. Qualitative and quantitative analysis reveals that the gating mechanism successfully locks generation into specific semantic clusters (e.g., Finance, Science) and resists associative drift, offering a parameter-efficient path toward more controllable language modeling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.
Builds on
29 of 46 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
17 more
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
- 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 688
- 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 607
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
- 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
- 2024Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Predictioncited by 344
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2017The Consciousness Priorcited by 105
- 2021Coordination Among Neural Modules Through a Shared Global Workspacecited by 83
- 2016TopicRNN: A Recurrent Neural Network with Long-Range Semantic Dependencycited by 27
Built on by
Not cited yet.