Limitations of Membership Queries in Testable Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Membership queries (MQ) often yield speedups for learning tasks, particularly in the distribution-specific setting. We show that in the testable learning model of Rubinfeld and Vasilyan [RV23], membership queries cannot decrease the time complexity of testable learning algorithms beyond the complexity of sample-only distribution-specific learning. In the testable learning model, the learner must output a hypothesis whenever the data distribution satisfies a desired property, and if it outputs a hypothesis, the hypothesis must be near-optimal. We give a general reduction from sample-based refutation of boolean concept classes, as presented in [Vadhan17, KL18], to testable learning with queries (TL-Q). This yields lower bounds for TL-Q via the reduction from learning to refutation given in [KL18]. The result is that, relative to a concept class and a distribution family, no m-sample TL-Q algorithm can be super-polynomially more time-efficient than the best m-sample PAC learner. Finally, we define a class of ``statistical'' MQ algorithms that encompasses many known distribution-specific MQ learners, such as those based on influence estimation or subcube-conditional statistical queries. We show that TL-Q algorithms in this class imply efficient statistical-query refutation and learning algorithms. Thus, combined with known SQ dimension lower bounds, our results imply that these efficient membership query learners cannot be made testable.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.
Builds on
12 of 29 references.
References · 12
- 2015Complexity Theoretic Limitations on Learning Halfspacescited by 50
- 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
- 2022A Moment-Matching Approach to Testable Learning and a New Characterization of Rademacher Complexitycited by 27
- 2023Testable Learning with Distribution Shiftcited by 25
- 2014Complexity theoretic limitations on learning DNF'scited by 21
- 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
- 2023Efficient Testable Learning of Halfspaces with Adversarial Label Noisecited by 19
- 2023Tester-Learners for Halfspaces: Universal Algorithmscited by 17
- 2013From average case complexity to improper learning complexitycited by 16
- 2024Learning Intersections of Halfspaces with Distribution Shift: Improved Algorithms and SQ Lower Boundscited by 13
- 2024Testably Learning Polynomial Threshold Functionscited by 11
- 2025Quality control in sublinear time: a case study via random graphscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.