mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physically Interpretable Representation Learning with Gaussian Mixture Variational AutoEncoder (GM-VAE)

arXiv 2511.21883 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Extracting compact, physically interpretable representations from high-dimensional scientific data is a persistent challenge due to the complex, nonlinear structures inherent in physical systems. We propose a Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoder (GM-VAE) framework designed to address this by integrating an Expectation-Maximization (EM)-inspired training scheme with a novel spectral interpretability metric. Unlike conventional VAEs that jointly optimize reconstruction and clustering (often leading to training instability), our method utilizes a block-coordinate descent strategy, alternating between expectation and maximization steps. This approach stabilizes training and naturally aligns latent clusters with distinct physical regimes. To objectively evaluate the learned representations, we introduce a quantitative metric based on graph-Laplacian smoothness, which measures the coherence of physical quantities across the latent manifold. We demonstrate the efficacy of this framework on datasets of increasing complexity: surface reaction ODEs, Navier-Stokes wake flows, and experimental laser-induced combustion Schlieren images. The results show that our GM-VAE yields smooth, physically consistent manifolds and accurate regime clustering, offering a robust data-driven tool for interpreting turbulent and reactive flow systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.

Builds on

16 of 43 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  2. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  4. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 364
  5. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  6. 2016Deep Unsupervised Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 219
  7. 2016Variational Deep Embedding: An Unsupervised and Generative Approach to Clusteringcited by 219
  8. 2023β-Variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flowscited by 76
  9. 2020Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metricscited by 69
  10. 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencodercited by 15
  11. 2022Unsupervised physics-informed disentanglement of multimodal data for high-throughput scientific discoverycited by 6
  12. 2025On the definition and importance of interpretability in scientific machine learningcited by 5
4 more
  1. 2023Convolutional autoencoder for the spatiotemporal latent representation of turbulencecited by 4
  2. 2021Variational embedding of protein folding simulations using gaussian mixture variational autoencoderscited by 3
  3. 2025Physically Interpretable Representation and Controlled Generation for Turbulence Datacited by 2
  4. 2025Stabilization Analysis and Mode Recognition of Kerosene Supersonic Combustion: A Deep Learning Approach Based on Res-CNN-beta-VAEcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.