mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Actionable and diverse counterfactual explanations incorporating domain knowledge and plausibility constraints

arXiv 2511.20236 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual explanations improve the actionable interpretability of machine learning models by identifying minimal changes required to achieve a desired outcome. However, existing methods often neglect dependencies among features, which can lead to unrealistic or impractical modifications. This limitation reduces the usefulness of counterfactual explanations in real-world decision-support systems. Motivated by applications in cybersecurity for email marketing, we propose DANCE (Diverse, Actionable, and Knowledge-Constrained Explanations), a method for generating counterfactuals that incorporate feature dependencies and domain constraints. DANCE models relationships between features using linear and probabilistic structures that can be learned from data or specified by experts. These dependencies are enforced during the search process to improve plausibility and feasibility. The method jointly optimizes plausibility, diversity, proximity, and sparsity within a unified objective. We evaluate DANCE on 140 datasets from OpenML and demonstrate that it achieves competitive or superior performance compared to existing approaches across multiple evaluation criteria. Additionally, we validate the method in a real-world industrial setting in collaboration with an email marketing platform, showing that it produces domain-consistent and actionable recommendations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

18 of 38 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,203
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,088
  3. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 748
  4. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 735
  5. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  6. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  7. 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
  8. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  9. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
  10. 2021Counterfactuals and Causability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Theory, Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 59
  11. 2018FIRST: A Framework for Optimizing Information Quality in Mobile Crowdsensing Systemscited by 50
  12. 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A surveycited by 48
6 more
  1. 2019Model Agnostic Contrastive Explanations for Structured Datacited by 41
  2. 2021Optimal Counterfactual Explanations in Tree Ensemblescited by 36
  3. 2024Probabilistically Plausible Counterfactual Explanations with Normalizing Flowscited by 11
  4. 2020Fast Real-time Counterfactual Explanationscited by 8
  5. 2024User-centric evaluation of explainability of AI with and for humans: a comprehensive empirical studycited by 4
  6. 2025From Prototypes to Sparse ECG Explanations: SHAP-Driven Counterfactuals for Multivariate Time-Series Multi-class Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.