mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AppSelectBench: Application-Level Tool Selection Benchmark

arXiv 2511.19957 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer Using Agents (CUAs) are increasingly equipped with external tools, enabling them to perform complex and realistic tasks. For CUAs to operate effectively, application selection, which refers to deciding which application to use before invoking fine-grained tools such as APIs, is a fundamental capability. It determines whether the agent initializes the correct environment, avoids orchestration confusion, and efficiently focuses on relevant context. However, existing benchmarks primarily assess fine-grained API selection, offering limited insight into whether models can reason across and choose between different applications. To fill this gap, we introduce AppSelectBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating application selection in CUAs. AppSelectBench contains a novel user task generation pipeline that produces realistic, diverse, and semantically grounded user intents at scale, together with unified evaluation protocols covering random, heuristic, zero-shot, few-shot, and retrieval-augmented-settings. AppSelectBench covers one hundred widely used desktop applications and includes more than one hundred thousand realistic, diverse, and semantically grounded user tasks. Extensive experiments across both closed-source and open-source large language models reveal systematic strengths and weaknesses in inter-application reasoning, showing that even the most capable models still struggle to make consistent application choices. Together, these results establish AppSelectBench as a foundation for studying and advancing application level reasoning, an essential yet underexplored capability of intelligent CUAs. The source is available at https://microsoft.github.io/appselectbench/.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

24 of 29 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  6. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  7. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  8. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  9. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 675
  10. 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
  11. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
  12. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
12 more
  1. 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedbackcited by 293
  2. 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 273
  3. 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 221
  4. 2024Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at Scalecited by 212
  5. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
  6. 2025UI-TARS-2 Technical Report: Advancing GUI Agent with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 205
  7. 2025OpenCUA: Open Foundations for Computer-Use Agentscited by 151
  8. 2024StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Modelscited by 129
  9. 2023On the Tool Manipulation Capability of Open-source Large Language Modelscited by 122
  10. 2025UltraCUA: A Foundation Model for Computer Use Agents with Hybrid Actioncited by 30
  11. 2025Phi-Ground Tech Report: Advancing Perception in GUI Groundingcited by 24
  12. 2024MathViz-E: A Case-study in Domain-Specialized Tool-Using Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-Use
  2. 2026MacAgentBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Real-World macOS Desktop
  3. 2026Same Tasks, Different Apps: Why Mobile GUI Agents Fail to Generalize?
  4. 2025UI-CUBE: Enterprise-Grade Computer Use Agent Benchmarking Beyond Task Accuracy to Operational Reliability
  5. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents
  6. 2025MCPWorld: A Unified Benchmarking Testbed for API, GUI, and Hybrid Computer Use Agents
  7. 2025From Prompt to Product: A Human-Centered Benchmark of Agentic App Generation Systems
  8. 2026MobileBench-OL: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Mobile GUI Agents in Real-World Environment