Making Every Head Count: Sparse Attention Without the Speed-Performance Trade-off
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The design of Large Language Models (LLMs) has long been hampered by a fundamental conflict within their core attention mechanism: its remarkable expressivity is built upon a computational complexity of O(H N^2) that grows quadratically with the context size (N) and linearly with the number of heads (H). This standard implementation harbors significant computational redundancy, as all heads independently compute attention over the same sequence space. Existing sparse methods, meanwhile, often trade information integrity for computational efficiency. To resolve this efficiency-performance trade-off, we propose SPAttention, whose core contribution is the introduction of a new paradigm we term Principled Structural Sparsity. SPAttention does not merely drop connections but instead reorganizes the computational task by partitioning the total attention workload into balanced, non-overlapping distance bands, assigning each head a unique segment. This approach transforms the multi-head attention mechanism from H independent O(N^2) computations into a single, collaborative O(N^2) computation, fundamentally reducing complexity by a factor of H. The structured inductive bias compels functional specialization among heads, enabling a more efficient allocation of computational resources from redundant modeling to distinct dependencies across the entire sequence span. Our work demonstrates that thoughtfully designed structural sparsity can serve as an effective inductive bias that simultaneously improves both computational efficiency and model performance, opening a new avenue for the architectural design of next-generation, high-performance LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
19 of 26 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
- 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
- 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,085
7 more
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
- 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 696
- 2020Sparse Sinkhorn Attentioncited by 250
- 2019Adaptively Sparse Transformerscited by 154
- 2020Talking-Heads Attentioncited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Mosaic Pruning: A Hierarchical Framework for Generalizable Pruning of Mixture-of-Experts Modelscited by 10
- 2026Hallucinations as Orthogonal Noise: Inference-Time Manifold Alignment via Dynamic Contextual Orthogonalizationcited by 1
- 2026Awakening Dormant Experts:Counterfactual Routing to Mitigate MoE Hallucinationscited by 0
- 2026Resonant Context Anchoring: Decoupling Attention Routing and Signal Gain at Inference Timecited by 0
- 2026Regret Pre-training: Bridging Prior and Posterior Views for Enhanced Knowledge Groundingcited by 0
- 2026CoWindow Attention: Full Causal Coverage Is a Collective Propertycited by 0
- 2026CoWindow Attention: Full Causal Coverage Is a Collective Property26 Sep 2026
- 2026Regret Pre-training: Bridging Prior and Posterior Views for Enhanced Knowledge Grounding2 Jun 2026
- 2026Hallucinations as Orthogonal Noise: Inference-Time Manifold Alignment via Dynamic Contextual Orthogonalization2 Jun 2026
- 2026Resonant Context Anchoring: Decoupling Attention Routing and Signal Gain at Inference Time1 Jun 2026
- 2026Awakening Dormant Experts:Counterfactual Routing to Mitigate MoE Hallucinations15 Apr 2026
- 2025Mosaic Pruning: A Hierarchical Framework for Generalizable Pruning of Mixture-of-Experts Models25 Nov 2025