mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-REAL: Towards Realism and Plausibility Evaluation for AI-Generated Content

arXiv 2511.16908 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quality assessment of AI-generated content is crucial for evaluating model capability and guiding model optimization. However, most existing quality assessment datasets and models provide only a single quality score, which is too coarse to offer targeted guidance for improving generative models. In current applications of AI-generated images, realism and plausibility are two critical dimensions, and with the emergence of unified generation-understanding models, fine-grained evaluation along these dimensions becomes especially effective for improving generative performance. Therefore, we introduce Q-Real, a novel dataset for fine-grained evaluation of realism and plausibility in AI-generated images. Q-Real consists of 3,088 images generated by popular text-to-image models. For each image, we annotate the locations of major entities and provide a set of judgment questions and attribution descriptions for these along the dimensions of realism and plausibility. Considering that recent advances in multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) enable fine-grained evaluation of AI-generated images, we construct Q-Real Bench to evaluate them on two tasks: judgment and grounding with reasoning. Finally, to enhance MLLM capabilities, we design a fine-tuning framework and conduct experiments on multiple MLLMs using our dataset. Experimental results demonstrate the high quality and significance of our dataset and the comprehensiveness of the benchmark. Dataset and code will be released upon publication.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

Builds on

33 of 46 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  5. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  8. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  9. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
  10. 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,023
  11. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  12. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
21 more
  1. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  2. 2024LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 584
  3. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  4. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
  5. 2023InternLM-XComposer: A Vision-Language Large Model for Advanced Text-image Comprehension and Compositioncited by 297
  6. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
  7. 2025HPSv3: Towards Wide-Spectrum Human Preference Scorecited by 211
  8. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 205
  9. 2023Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Modelscited by 152
  10. 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
  11. 2023Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 141
  12. 2025Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores using Score Distributioncited by 141
  13. 2024GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Generative Modelscited by 82
  14. 2025ArtiMuse: Fine-Grained Image Aesthetics Assessment with Joint Scoring and Expert-Level Understandingcited by 41
  15. 2024Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMscited by 39
  16. 2024AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 33
  17. 2025Q-Eval-100K: Evaluating Visual Quality and Alignment Level for Text-to-Vision Contentcited by 32
  18. 2023Q-Boost: On Visual Quality Assessment Ability of Low-level Multi-Modality Foundation Modelscited by 22
  19. 2024Grounding-IQA: Grounding Multimodal Language Model for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 12
  20. 2025SD3.5-Flash: Distribution-Guided Distillation of Generative Flowscited by 11
  21. 2025Identity-GRPO: Optimizing Multi-Human Identity-preserving Video Generation via Reinforcement Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026QQJ: Quantifying Qualitative Judgment for Scalable and Human-Aligned Evaluation of Generative AI
  2. 2026Evaluating the Evaluators: Diagnosing Large Multimodal Models for AI-Generated Image Assessment
  3. 2024A-Bench: Are LMMs Masters at Evaluating AI-generated Images?
  4. 2025M3-AGIQA: Multimodal, Multi-Round, Multi-Aspect AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment
  5. 2024Consistency-diversity-realism Pareto fronts of conditional image generative models
  6. 2025Image Realness Assessment and Localization with Multimodal Features
  7. 2026Q-Tacit: Image Quality Assessment via Latent Visual Reasoning
  8. 2026REALIS: A Curated Dataset for Studying the Challenges of AI Image Detection