mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Q-Eval-100K: Evaluating Visual Quality and Alignment Level for Text-to-Vision Content

arXiv 2503.02357 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating text-to-vision content hinges on two crucial aspects: visual quality and alignment. While significant progress has been made in developing objective models to assess these dimensions, the performance of such models heavily relies on the scale and quality of human annotations. According to Scaling Law, increasing the number of human-labeled instances follows a predictable pattern that enhances the performance of evaluation models. Therefore, we introduce a comprehensive dataset designed to Evaluate Visual quality and Alignment Level for text-to-vision content (Q-EVAL-100K), featuring the largest collection of human-labeled Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) for the mentioned two aspects. The Q-EVAL-100K dataset encompasses both text-to-image and text-to-video models, with 960K human annotations specifically focused on visual quality and alignment for 100K instances (60K images and 40K videos). Leveraging this dataset with context prompt, we propose Q-Eval-Score, a unified model capable of evaluating both visual quality and alignment with special improvements for handling long-text prompt alignment. Experimental results indicate that the proposed Q-Eval-Score achieves superior performance on both visual quality and alignment, with strong generalization capabilities across other benchmarks. These findings highlight the significant value of the Q-EVAL-100K dataset. Data and codes will be available at https://github.com/zzc-1998/Q-Eval.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 18; 2026: 14.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deploymentcited by 116
  2. 2025Q-Insight: Understanding Image Quality via Visual Reinforcement Learningcited by 98
  3. 2025Reasoning as Representation: Rethinking Visual Reinforcement Learning in Image Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  4. 2025MMIG-Bench: Towards Comprehensive and Explainable Evaluation of Multi-Modal Image Generation Modelscited by 17
  5. 2025LOVE: Benchmarking and Evaluating Text-to-Video Generation and Video-to-Text Interpretationcited by 10
  6. 2025RadarQA: Multi-modal Quality Analysis of Weather Radar Forecastscited by 8
  7. 2026X2HDR: HDR Image Generation in a Perceptually Uniform Spacecited by 7
  8. 2025NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Resultscited by 6
  9. 2025UARE: A Unified Vision-Language Model for Image Quality Assessment, Restoration, and Enhancementcited by 5
  10. 2025LongT2IBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long Text-to-Image Generation with Graph-structured Annotationscited by 5
  11. 2026Fine-grained Image Aesthetic Assessment: Learning Discriminative Scores from Relative Rankscited by 5
  12. 2025Engagement Prediction of Short Videos with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 4
20 more
  1. 2025Towards Holistic Visual Quality Assessment of AI-Generated Videos: A LLM-Based Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Modelcited by 2
  2. 2025What Makes a Good Generated Image? Investigating Human and Multimodal LLM Image Preference Alignmentcited by 1
  3. 2025VITAL: Vision-Encoder-centered Pre-training for LMMs in Visual Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  4. 2026ELIQ: A Label-Free Framework for Quality Assessment of Evolving AI-Generated Imagescited by 1
  5. 2026EduVQA: Towards Concept-Aware Assessment of Educational AI-Generated Videoscited by 1
  6. 2026TIQA: Human-Aligned Perceptual Text Quality Assessment in Generated Imagescited by 1
  7. 2026OARS: Process-Aware Online Alignment for Generative Real-World Image Super-Resolutioncited by 1
  8. 2026Towards Characterizing Scientific Image Utility and Upgradabilitycited by 1
  9. 2026DriftScope: Measuring The Hidden Effects of Diffusion Model Adaptationcited by 1
  10. 2025AU-IQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Perceptual Quality Assessment of AI-Enhanced User-Generated Contentcited by 0
  11. 2025DREAM: A Benchmark Study for Deepfake photoREalism AssessMentcited by 0
  12. 2025Q-REAL: Towards Realism and Plausibility Evaluation for AI-Generated Contentcited by 0
  13. 2025Beyond Pixels: Benchmarking and Reward-Based Assessing Framework for Visual Spatial Aestheticscited by 0
  14. 2025Evaluating and Preserving High-level Fidelity in Super-Resolutioncited by 0
  15. 2026Comparison Drives Preference: Reference-Aware Modeling for AI-Generated Video Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  16. 2026Plan-and-Verify Video Reward Reasoning with Spatio-Temporal Scene Graph Groundingcited by 0
  17. 2026LumaGuide: Distribution Shaping for Training-Free HDR Generation in Diffusion Modelscited by 0
  18. 2026AGIDefect-4K: A Richly Annotated Dataset for AI-Generated Image Defect Detection, Localization and Explanationcited by 0
  19. 2026From Glance to Scrutiny: Progressive Distortion Reasoning for Fine-Grained Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  20. 2026LLaVA-Assessor: Building the Foundation LMM For Visual Quality Assessmentcited by 0