How Language Directions Align with Token Geometry in Multilingual LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual LLMs demonstrate strong performance across diverse languages, yet there has been limited systematic analysis of how language information is structured within their internal representation space and how it emerges across layers. We conduct a comprehensive probing study on six multilingual LLMs, covering all 268 transformer layers, using linear and nonlinear probes together with a new Token--Language Alignment analysis to quantify the layer-wise dynamics and geometric structure of language encoding. Our results show that language information becomes sharply separated in the first transformer block (+76.4±8.2 percentage points from Layer 0 to 1) and remains almost fully linearly separable throughout model depth. We further find that the alignment between language directions and vocabulary embeddings is strongly tied to the language composition of the training data. Notably, Chinese-inclusive models achieve a ZH Match@Peak of 16.43%, whereas English-centric models achieve only 3.90%, revealing a 4.21× structural imprinting effect. These findings indicate that multilingual LLMs distinguish languages not by surface script features but by latent representational structures shaped by the training corpus. Our analysis provides practical insights for data composition strategies and fairness in multilingual representation learning. All code and analysis scripts are publicly available at: https://github.com/thisiskorea/How-Language-Directions-Align-with-Token-Geometry-in-Multilingual-LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.
Builds on
5 of 11 references.
References · 5
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
- 2020Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTcited by 108
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Middle-Layer Representation Alignment for Cross-Lingual Transfer in Fine-Tuned LLMs
- 2025Can you map it to English? The Role of Cross-Lingual Alignment in Multilingual Performance of LLMs
- 2024Concept Space Alignment in Multilingual LLMs
- 2024Understanding the role of FFNs in driving multilingual behaviour in LLMs
- 2026Cross-Lingual Alignment Without Joint Training: Do Monolingual Language Models Converge on Universal Representations?
- 2024Exploring Alignment in Shared Cross-lingual Spaces
- 2024A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias
- 2025The Hidden Space of Safety: Understanding Preference-Tuned LLMs in Multilingual context