mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Black-Box to White-Box: Control-Theoretic Neural Network Interpretability

arXiv 2511.12852 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks achieve state of the art performance but remain difficult to interpret mechanistically. In this work, we propose a control theoretic framework that treats a trained neural network as a nonlinear state space system and uses local linearization, controllability and observability Gramians, and Hankel singular values to analyze its internal computation. For a given input, we linearize the network around the corresponding hidden activation pattern and construct a state space model whose state consists of hidden neuron activations. The input state and state output Jacobians define local controllability and observability Gramians, from which we compute Hankel singular values and associated modes. These quantities provide a principled notion of neuron and pathway importance: controllability measures how easily each neuron can be excited by input perturbations, observability measures how strongly each neuron influences the output, and Hankel singular values rank internal modes that carry input output energy. We illustrate the framework on simple feedforward networks, including a 1 2 2 1 SwiGLU network and a 2 3 3 2 GELU network. By comparing different operating points, we show how activation saturation reduces controllability, shrinks the dominant Hankel singular value, and shifts the dominant internal mode to a different subset of neurons. The proposed method turns a neural network into a collection of local white box dynamical models and suggests which internal directions are natural candidates for pruning or constraints to improve interpretability.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2025.

Builds on

9 of 19 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  7. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  8. 2020On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 88
  9. 2025Hankel Singular Value Regularization for Highly Compressible State Space Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Observability conditions for neural state-space models with eigenvalues and their roots of unity
  2. 2024Generalisation to unseen topologies: Towards control of biological neural network activity
  3. 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning
  4. 2026Causal Interpretation of Neural Network Computations with Contribution Decomposition
  5. 2026Traversing the solution space of neural networks with Hessian Null Space Continuation
  6. 2025State Space Models Naturally Produce Time Cell and Oscillatory Behaviors and Scale to Abstract Cognitive Functions
  7. 2023Identifying Interpretable Visual Features in Artificial and Biological Neural Systems
  8. 2025Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition