mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Interpretation of Neural Network Computations with Contribution Decomposition

arXiv 2603.06557 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LG q-bio.NCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how neural networks transform inputs into outputs is crucial for interpreting and manipulating their behavior. Most existing approaches analyze internal representations by identifying hidden-layer activation patterns correlated with human-interpretable concepts. Here we take a direct approach to examine how hidden neurons act to drive network outputs. We introduce CODEC (Contribution Decomposition), a method that uses sparse autoencoders to decompose network behavior into sparse motifs of hidden-neuron contributions, revealing causal processes that cannot be determined by analyzing activations alone. Applying CODEC to benchmark image-classification networks, we find that contributions grow in sparsity and dimensionality across layers and, unexpectedly, that they progressively decorrelate positive and negative effects on network outputs. We further show that decomposing contributions into sparse modes enables greater control and interpretation of intermediate layers, supporting both causal manipulations of network output and human-interpretable visualizations of distinct image components that combine to drive that output. Finally, by analyzing state-of-the-art models of neural activity in the vertebrate retina, we demonstrate that CODEC uncovers combinatorial actions of model interneurons and identifies the sources of dynamic receptive fields. Overall, CODEC provides a rich and interpretable framework for understanding how nonlinear computations evolve across hierarchical layers, establishing contribution modes as an informative unit of analysis for mechanistic insights into artificial neural networks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 30 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  9. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  10. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  11. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  12. 2019From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal predictioncited by 11
1 more
  1. 2022Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Riemann-Stieltjes Integrated Gradient-based Localizationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.