MPD-SGR: Robust Spiking Neural Networks with Membrane Potential Distribution-Driven Surrogate Gradient Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The surrogate gradient (SG) method has shown significant promise in enhancing the performance of deep spiking neural networks (SNNs), but it also introduces vulnerabilities to adversarial attacks. Although spike coding strategies and neural dynamics parameters have been extensively studied for their impact on robustness, the critical role of gradient magnitude, which reflects the model's sensitivity to input perturbations, remains underexplored. In SNNs, the gradient magnitude is primarily determined by the interaction between the membrane potential distribution (MPD) and the SG function. In this study, we investigate the relationship between the MPD and SG and their implications for improving the robustness of SNNs. Our theoretical analysis reveals that reducing the proportion of membrane potentials lying within the gradient-available range of the SG function effectively mitigates the sensitivity of SNNs to input perturbations. Building upon this insight, we propose a novel MPD-driven surrogate gradient regularization (MPD-SGR) method, which enhances robustness by explicitly regularizing the MPD based on its interaction with the SG function. Extensive experiments across multiple image classification benchmarks and diverse network architectures confirm that the MPD-SGR method significantly enhances the resilience of SNNs to adversarial perturbations and exhibits strong generalizability across diverse network configurations, SG functions, and spike encoding schemes.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 626
- 2020Going Deeper With Directly-Trained Larger Spiking Neural Networkscited by 278
- 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2017SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networkscited by 182
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2020Inherent Adversarial Robustness of Deep Spiking Neural Networks: Effects of Discrete Input Encoding and Non-Linear Activationscited by 48
7 more
- 2019A Comprehensive Analysis on Adversarial Robustness of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2020Exploring Adversarial Attack in Spiking Neural Networks with Spike-Compatible Gradientcited by 31
- 2020Securing Deep Spiking Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks through Inherent Structural Parameterscited by 27
- 2021Learngene: From Open-World to Your Learning Taskcited by 27
- 2020Towards Understanding the Effect of Leak in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2024Enhancing Adversarial Robustness in SNNs with Sparse Gradientscited by 10
- 2024RSC-SNN: Exploring the Trade-off Between Adversarial Robustness and Accuracy in Spiking Neural Networks via Randomized Smoothing Codingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026TP-Spikformer: Token Pruned Spiking Transformercited by 4
- 2026Robust Spiking Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attackscited by 0
- 2026TP-Spikformer: Token Pruned Spiking Transformer28 Feb 2026
- 2026Robust Spiking Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks24 Feb 2026