mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MetaGDPO: Alleviating Catastrophic Forgetting with Metacognitive Knowledge through Group Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2511.12113 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, which can be effectively compressed into smaller models. However, existing datasets and fine-tuning approaches still face challenges that lead to catastrophic forgetting, particularly for models smaller than 8B. First, most datasets typically ignore the relationship between training data knowledge and the model's inherent abilities, making it difficult to preserve prior knowledge. Second, conventional training objectives often fail to constrain inherent knowledge preservation, which can result in forgetting of previously learned skills. To address these issues, we propose a comprehensive solution that alleviates catastrophic forgetting from both the data and fine-tuning approach perspectives. On the data side, we construct a dataset of 5K instances that covers multiple reasoning tasks and incorporates metacognitive knowledge, making it more tolerant and effective for distillation into smaller models. We annotate the metacognitive knowledge required to solve each question and filter the data based on task knowledge and the model's inherent skills. On the training side, we introduce GDPO (Group Direction Preference Optimization), which is better suited for resource-limited scenarios and can efficiently approximate the performance of GRPO. Guided by the large model and by implicitly constraining the optimization path through a reference model, GDPO enables more effective knowledge transfer from the large model and constrains excessive parameter drift. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly alleviates catastrophic forgetting and improves reasoning performance on smaller models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.

Builds on

24 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Imitate, Explore, and Self-Improve: A Reproduction Report on Slow-thinking Reasoning Systems12 Dec
  2. 2024O1 Replication Journey -- Part 2: Surpassing O1-preview through Simple Distillation, Big Progress or Bitter Lesson?25 Nov

Other references · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
  12. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
10 more
  1. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  3. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  4. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  5. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
  6. 2022CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamificationcited by 108
  7. 2016Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-controlcited by 100
  8. 2024ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teamingcited by 96
  9. 2025STAR-1: Safer Alignment of Reasoning LLMs with 1K Datacited by 67
  10. 2023LM-Cocktail: Resilient Tuning of Language Models via Model Mergingcited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CapTrack: Multifaceted Evaluation of Forgetting in LLM Post-Training
  2. 2026Beyond Meta-Reasoning: Metacognitive Consolidation for Self-Improving LLM Reasoning
  3. 2026MetaMem: Evolving Meta-Memory for Knowledge Utilization through Self-Reflective Symbolic Optimization
  4. 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgetting
  5. 2025Offline Learning and Forgetting for Reasoning with Large Language Models
  6. 2025Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasoners
  7. 2026AWARe: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting via Activation-Weighted Adaptive REtention
  8. 2025Forgetting as a Feature: Cognitive Alignment of Large Language Models