NegBLEURT Forest: Leveraging Inconsistencies for Detecting Jailbreak Attacks
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
Jailbreak attacks designed to bypass safety mechanisms pose a serious threat by prompting LLMs to generate harmful or inappropriate content, despite alignment with ethical guidelines. Crafting universal filtering rules remains difficult due to their inherent dependence on specific contexts. To address these challenges without relying on threshold calibration or model fine-tuning, this work introduces a semantic consistency analysis between successful and unsuccessful responses, demonstrating that a negation-aware scoring approach captures meaningful patterns. Building on this insight, a novel detection framework called NegBLEURT Forest is proposed to evaluate the degree of alignment between outputs elicited by adversarial prompts and expected safe behaviors. It identifies anomalous responses using the Isolation Forest algorithm, enabling reliable jailbreak detection. Experimental results show that the proposed method consistently achieves top-tier performance, ranking first or second in accuracy across diverse models using the crafted dataset, while competing approaches exhibit notable sensitivity to model and data variations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.
Builds on
21 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks3 Apr
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks2 Apr
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models28 Mar
- 2024Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic Smoothing25 Feb
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
- 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks5 Oct
- 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity27 Aug
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
Other references · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2023LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Trickedcited by 226
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2025Exploring the Impact of Temperature on Large Language Models:Hot or Cold?cited by 40
- 2023Bergeron: Combating Adversarial Attacks through a Conscience-Based Alignment Frameworkcited by 29
- 2023This is not correct! Negation-aware Evaluation of Language Generation Systemscited by 16
1 more
- 2019Sentence Lengthcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.