mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can AI Models be Jailbroken to Phish Elderly Victims? An End-to-End Evaluation

arXiv 2511.11759 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an end-to-end demonstration of how attackers can exploit AI safety failures to harm vulnerable populations: from jailbreaking LLMs to generate phishing content, to deploying those messages against real targets, to successfully compromising elderly victims. We systematically evaluated safety guardrails across six frontier LLMs spanning four attack categories, revealing critical failures where several models exhibited near-complete susceptibility to certain attack vectors. In a human validation study with 108 senior volunteers, AI-generated phishing emails successfully compromised 11% of participants. Our work uniquely demonstrates the complete attack pipeline targeting elderly populations, highlighting that current AI safety measures fail to protect those most vulnerable to fraud. Beyond generating phishing content, LLMs enable attackers to overcome language barriers and conduct multi-turn trust-building conversations at scale, fundamentally transforming fraud economics. While some providers report voluntary counter-abuse efforts, we argue these remain insufficient.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 3 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.

Builds on

3 of 11 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
  2. 2025EXPLICATE: Enhancing Phishing Detection through Explainable AI and LLM-Powered Interpretabilitycited by 6
  3. 2025The Impact of Emerging Phishing Threats: Assessing Quishing and LLM-generated Phishing Emails against Organizationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs
  2. 2026GuardPhish: Securing Open-Source LLMs from Phishing Abuse
  3. 2025Jailbreaking Generative AI: Empowering Novices to Conduct Phishing Attacks
  4. 2024Bridging the Protection Gap: Innovative Approaches to Shield Older Adults from AI-Enhanced Scams
  5. 2025Jailbreaking Generative AI: Multivector Phishing Threats and Transformer based Defenses
  6. 2025Phishing Detection in the Gen-AI Era: Quantized LLMs vs Classical Models
  7. 2025Dark LLMs: The Growing Threat of Unaligned AI Models
  8. 2024Human-Readable Adversarial Prompts: An Investigation into LLM Vulnerabilities Using Situational Context