Toward bilipshiz geometric models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many neural networks for point clouds are, by design, invariant to the symmetries of this datatype: permutations and rigid motions. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether such networks preserve natural symmetry aware distances on the point cloud spaces, through the notion of bi-Lipschitz equivalence. This inquiry is motivated by recent work in the Equivariant learning literature which highlights the advantages of bi-Lipschitz models in other scenarios. We consider two symmetry aware metrics on point clouds: (a) The Procrustes Matching (PM) metric and (b) Hard Gromov Wasserstien distances. We show that these two distances themselves are not bi-Lipschitz equivalent, and as a corollary deduce that popular invariant networks for point clouds are not bi-Lipschitz with respect to the PM metric. We then show how these networks can be modified so that they do obtain bi-Lipschitz guarantees. Finally, we provide initial experiments showing the advantage of the proposed bi-Lipschitz model over standard invariant models, for the tasks of finding correspondences between 3D point clouds.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,295
- 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 957
- 2018Tensor field networks: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point cloudscited by 739
- 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 559
- 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 469
- 2021GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for Moleculescited by 342
- 2019Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 320
- 2021Vector Neurons: A General Framework for SO(3)-Equivariant Networkscited by 305
- 2020Fast and Uncertainty-Aware Directional Message Passing for Non-Equilibrium Moleculescited by 254
- 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 177
- 2019On the equivalence between graph isomorphism testing and function approximation with GNNscited by 172
- 2021Spherical Message Passing for 3D Graph Networkscited by 167
17 more
- 2020On the Universality of Rotation Equivariant Point Cloud Networkscited by 80
- 2022Low Dimensional Invariant Embeddings for Universal Geometric Learningcited by 38
- 2023Is Distance Matrix Enough for Geometric Deep Learning?cited by 22
- 2022Permutation Invariant Representations with Applications to Graph Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2022Group-invariant max filteringcited by 18
- 2024On the Completeness of Invariant Geometric Deep Learning Modelscited by 11
- 2016Exact Recovery with Symmetries for Procrustes Matchingcited by 10
- 2023Three iterations of (d-1)-WL test distinguish non isometric clouds of d-dimensional pointscited by 9
- 2024FSW-GNN: A Bi-Lipschitz WL-Equivalent Graph Neural Networkcited by 8
- 2025Fourier Sliced-Wasserstein Embedding for Multisets and Measurescited by 8
- 2023Recognizing Rigid Patterns of Unlabeled Point Clouds by Complete and Continuous Isometry Invariants with no False Negatives and no False Positivescited by 7
- 2019Linearly Converging Quasi Branch and Bound Algorithms for Global Rigid Registrationcited by 6
- 2023ChiENN: Embracing Molecular Chirality with Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024Stability of sorting based embeddingscited by 3
- 2025Bi-Lipschitz Ansatz for Anti-Symmetric Functionscited by 3
- 2025The stability of generalized phase retrieval problem over compact groupscited by 2
- 2025Quantitative Bounds for Sorting-Based Permutation-Invariant Embeddingscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.