mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Three iterations of (d-1)-WL test distinguish non isometric clouds of d-dimensional points

arXiv 2303.12853 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.DMcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Weisfeiler--Lehman (WL) test is a fundamental iterative algorithm for checking isomorphism of graphs. It has also been observed that it underlies the design of several graph neural network architectures, whose capabilities and performance can be understood in terms of the expressive power of this test. Motivated by recent developments in machine learning applications to datasets involving three-dimensional objects, we study when the WL test is em complete for clouds of euclidean points represented by complete distance graphs, i.e., when it can distinguish, up to isometry, any arbitrary such cloud. %arbitrary clouds of euclidean points represented by complete distance graphs. % How many dimensions of the Weisfeiler--Lehman test is enough to distinguish any two non-isometric point clouds in d-dimensional Euclidean space, assuming that these point clouds are given as complete graphs labeled by distances between the points? This question is important for understanding, which architectures of graph neural networks are capable of fully exploiting the spacial structure of a point cloud. Our main result states that the (d-1)-dimensional WL test is complete for point clouds in d-dimensional Euclidean space, for any d≥ 2, and that only three iterations of the test suffice. We also observe that the d-dimensional WL test only requires one iteration to achieve completeness. Our paper thus provides complete understanding of the 3-dimensional case: it was shown in previous works that 1-WL is not complete in ℝ3, and we show that 2-WL is complete there. We also strengthen the lower bound for 1-WL by showing that it is unable to recognize planar point clouds in ℝ3. Finally, we show that 2-WL is not complete in ℝ6, leaving as an open question, whether it is complete in ℝd for d = 4,5.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2023.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  5. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
  6. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  7. 2021Weisfeiler and Leman go Machine Learning: The Story so farcited by 121
  8. 2023Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivitycited by 119
  9. 2023On the Expressive Power of Geometric Graph Neural Networkscited by 89
  10. 2021The Logic of Graph Neural Networkscited by 84
  11. 2022Weisfeiler and Leman Go Relationalcited by 28
  12. 2023Is Distance Matrix Enough for Geometric Deep Learning?cited by 22
1 more
  1. 2022Incompleteness of graph neural networks for points clouds in three dimensionscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.