mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analogical Structure, Minimal Contextual Cues and Contrastive Distractors: Input Design for Sample-Efficient Linguistic Rule Induction

arXiv 2511.10441 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models achieve strong performance on many tasks, but their training makes it hard to see which properties of the input support efficient linguistic rule learning. We ask how three cognitively-inspired principles of input design support sample-efficient linguistic rule induction: analogical structure, contrastive learning, and minimal contextual cue. We also ask how their effects compare to those of LLMs on the same controlled tasks. We implement these principles in structured sentence completion tasks that test English verb alternations. Lightweight models trained on hundreds to one-thousand such examples learn the alternation rules with high F1 on these tasks. Ablation studies show that analogical organisation is the main driver of sample efficiency, and contrastive distractors and minimal context help further gains. We also evaluate zero- and few-shot LLMs on the same tasks. In this controlled setting, the lightweight models reach higher F1 with far fewer task-specific data. We treat this contrast as a comparison between learning regimes rather than a general verdict on LLMs. Our results show that careful input organisation supports sample-efficient learning of linguistic rules and reveals distinct learning signatures for trained lightweight models and prompted LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 45 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  10. 2023StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Datacited by 343
  11. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
  12. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
11 more
  1. 2023RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQLcited by 195
  2. 2023Large Language Models as Analogical Reasonerscited by 107
  3. 2021BERT is to NLP what AlexNet is to CV: Can Pre-Trained Language Models Identify Analogies?cited by 56
  4. 2020Syntax-guided Controlled Generation of Paraphrasescited by 47
  5. 2023StoryAnalogy: Deriving Story-level Analogies from Large Language Models to Unlock Analogical Understandingcited by 26
  6. 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
  7. 2023In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntaxcited by 22
  8. 2020Investigating Novel Verb Learning in BERT: Selectional Preference Classes and Alternation-Based Syntactic Generalizationcited by 16
  9. 2023Beneath Surface Similarity: Large Language Models Make Reasonable Scientific Analogies after Structure Abductioncited by 11
  10. 2024I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language Modelscited by 10
  11. 2022Understanding Narratives through Dimensions of Analogycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.