mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language Models

arXiv 2401.05300 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Statements involving metalinguistic self-reference ("This paper has six sections.") are prevalent in many domains. Can current large language models (LLMs) handle such language? In this paper, we present "I am a Strange Dataset", a new dataset for addressing this question. There are two subtasks: generation and verification. In generation, models continue statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is" (where a correct continuation is "is"). In verification, models judge the truth of statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is sentence." (false). We also provide minimally different metalinguistic non-self-reference examples to complement the main dataset by probing for whether models can handle metalinguistic language at all. The dataset is hand-crafted by experts and validated by non-expert annotators. We test a variety of open-source LLMs (7B to 70B parameters) as well as closed-source LLMs through APIs. All models perform close to chance across both subtasks and even on the non-self-referential metalinguistic control data, though we find some steady improvement with model scale. GPT 4 is the only model to consistently do significantly better than chance, and it is still only in the 60% range, while our untrained human annotators score well in the 89-93% range. The dataset and evaluation toolkit are available at https://github.com/TristanThrush/i-am-a-strange-dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.

Builds on

19 of 45 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  4. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
  5. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  6. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
  7. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  8. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
  9. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
  10. 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
  11. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
  12. 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verificationcited by 166
7 more
  1. 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 163
  2. 2023Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generationcited by 128
  3. 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignmentcited by 48
  4. 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
  5. 2020Investigating Novel Verb Learning in BERT: Selectional Preference Classes and Alternation-Based Syntactic Generalizationcited by 16
  6. 2022ELQA: A Corpus of Metalinguistic Questions and Answers about Englishcited by 8
  7. 2023CuRIAM: Corpus re Interpretation and Metalanguage in U.S. Supreme Court Opinionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

10 papers.