I am a Strange Dataset: Metalinguistic Tests for Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Statements involving metalinguistic self-reference ("This paper has six sections.") are prevalent in many domains. Can current large language models (LLMs) handle such language? In this paper, we present "I am a Strange Dataset", a new dataset for addressing this question. There are two subtasks: generation and verification. In generation, models continue statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is" (where a correct continuation is "is"). In verification, models judge the truth of statements like "The penultimate word in this sentence is sentence." (false). We also provide minimally different metalinguistic non-self-reference examples to complement the main dataset by probing for whether models can handle metalinguistic language at all. The dataset is hand-crafted by experts and validated by non-expert annotators. We test a variety of open-source LLMs (7B to 70B parameters) as well as closed-source LLMs through APIs. All models perform close to chance across both subtasks and even on the non-self-referential metalinguistic control data, though we find some steady improvement with model scale. GPT 4 is the only model to consistently do significantly better than chance, and it is still only in the 60% range, while our untrained human annotators score well in the 89-93% range. The dataset and evaluation toolkit are available at https://github.com/TristanThrush/i-am-a-strange-dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.
Builds on
19 of 45 references.
References · 19
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
- 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verificationcited by 166
7 more
- 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 163
- 2023Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generationcited by 128
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignmentcited by 48
- 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
- 2020Investigating Novel Verb Learning in BERT: Selectional Preference Classes and Alternation-Based Syntactic Generalizationcited by 16
- 2022ELQA: A Corpus of Metalinguistic Questions and Answers about Englishcited by 8
- 2023CuRIAM: Corpus re Interpretation and Metalanguage in U.S. Supreme Court Opinionscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With Thiscited by 77
- 2025Language Models Fail to Introspect About Their Knowledge of Languagecited by 28
- 2024Natural Language Processing RELIES on Linguisticscited by 9
- 2024Do language models practice what they preach? Examining language ideologies about gendered language reform encoded in LLMscited by 5
- 2025Prompting from the bench: Large-scale pretraining is not sufficient to prepare LLMs for ordinary meaning analysiscited by 4
- 2025Analogical Structure, Minimal Contextual Cues and Contrastive Distractors: Input Design for Sample-Efficient Linguistic Rule Inductioncited by 1
- 2026Speaking of Language: Reflections on Metalanguage Research in NLPcited by 1
- 2026When Self-Reference Fails to Close: Matrix-Level Dynamics in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Robusto-1 Dataset: Comparing Humans and VLMs on real out-of-distribution Autonomous Driving VQA from Perucited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Metalinguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models across the World's Languagescited by 0
- 2026When Self-Reference Fails to Close: Matrix-Level Dynamics in Large Language Models13 Apr 2026
- 2026Speaking of Language: Reflections on Metalanguage Research in NLP3 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluating Metalinguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models across the World's Languages2 Feb 2026
- 2025Analogical Structure, Minimal Contextual Cues and Contrastive Distractors: Input Design for Sample-Efficient Linguistic Rule Induction13 Nov 2025
- 2025Prompting from the bench: Large-scale pretraining is not sufficient to prepare LLMs for ordinary meaning analysis29 Oct 2025
- 2025Robusto-1 Dataset: Comparing Humans and VLMs on real out-of-distribution Autonomous Driving VQA from Peru10 Mar 2025
- 2025Language Models Fail to Introspect About Their Knowledge of Language10 Mar 2025
- 2024Do language models practice what they preach? Examining language ideologies about gendered language reform encoded in LLMs20 Sep 2024
- 2024LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This9 Sep 2024
- 2024Natural Language Processing RELIES on Linguistics9 May 2024