Contextual morphologically-guided tokenization for Latin encoder models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tokenization is a critical component of language model pretraining, yet standard tokenization methods often prioritize information-theoretical goals like high compression and low fertility rather than linguistic goals like morphological alignment. In fact, they have been shown to be suboptimal for morphologically rich languages, where tokenization quality directly impacts downstream performance. In this work, we investigate morphologically-aware tokenization for Latin, a morphologically rich language that is medium-resource in terms of pretraining data, but high-resource in terms of curated lexical resources -- a distinction that is often overlooked but critical in discussions of low-resource language modeling. We find that morphologically-guided tokenization improves overall performance on four downstream tasks. Performance gains are most pronounced for out of domain texts, highlighting our models' improved generalization ability. Our findings demonstrate the utility of linguistic resources to improve language modeling for morphologically complex languages. For low-resource languages that lack large-scale pretraining data, the development and incorporation of linguistic resources can serve as a feasible alternative to improve LM performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 61 references.
References · 23
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,322
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,916
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,910
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,979
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 637
- 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 191
- 2020SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detectioncited by 106
- 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 89
- 2021Superbizarre Is Not Superb: Derivational Morphology Improves BERT's Interpretation of Complex Wordscited by 63
- 2022Impact of Tokenization on Language Models: An Analysis for Turkishcited by 62
- 2024Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?cited by 62
- 2020Latin BERT: A Contextual Language Model for Classical Philologycited by 43
11 more
- 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
- 2020Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysiscited by 37
- 2022The SIGMORPHON 2022 Shared Task on Morpheme Segmentationcited by 25
- 2025Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languagescited by 22
- 2024Egalitarian Language Representation in Language Models: It All Begins with Tokenizerscited by 20
- 2024Sui Generis: Large Language Models for Authorship Attribution and Verification in Latincited by 9
- 2025Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignmentcited by 9
- 2018What do character-level models learn about morphology? The case of dependency parsingcited by 8
- 2023What is the best recipe for character-level encoder-only modelling?cited by 6
- 2023LatinCy: Synthetic Trained Pipelines for Latin NLPcited by 5
- 2024Latin Treebanks in Review: An Evaluation of Morphological Tagging Across Timecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.