Accelerating Training Speed of Tiny Recursive Models with Curriculum Guided Adaptive Recursion
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Recursive reasoning models achieve strong performance through iterative refinement, allowing small networks to match large language models. However, training is computationally expensive, often requiring 36 GPU-hours for Sudoku extreme. Existing models use fixed recursion depth and uniform supervision weighting, leading to inefficient training. Objectives: We propose CGAR (Curriculum-Guided Adaptive Recursion), applying curriculum learning to architectural depth. CGAR introduces Progressive Depth Curriculum (PDC) to dynamically adjust recursion depth and Hierarchical Supervision Weighting (HSW) to apply exponentially decaying importance to supervision steps. Methods: PDC implements a three-stage schedule transitioning from shallow (2, 1) to full depth (6, 3) configurations, providing 41.4% FLOPs reduction. HSW applies exponential decay to supervision steps, achieving 40% gradient variance reduction and accelerated convergence. Results: On Sudoku-Extreme, CGAR achieves 1.71x training speedup (10.93 to 6.38 hours) with only a 0.63% accuracy drop (86.65% to 86.02%). PDC alone achieves 2.26x speedup with 85.47% accuracy, showing a Pareto improvement in efficiency and quality. HSW provides 1.61x speedup. CGAR-trained models show superior inference efficiency with 100% halting accuracy and 11% fewer reasoning steps. Conclusions: CGAR enables efficient training of recursive models on modest hardware. By treating depth as a scheduled parameter, it achieves substantial savings and prevents overfitting, making these models practical for neurosymbolic AI and program synthesis. https://github.com/Kaleemullahqasim/CGAR and huggingface.co/Kaleemullah/trm-cgar-sudoku.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
24 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Recursive Decomposition of Logical Thoughts: Framework for Superior Reasoning and Knowledge Propagation in Large Language Models3 Jan
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar
Other references · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
- 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 506
- 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 408
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 367
9 more
- 2017SkipNet: Learning Dynamic Routing in Convolutional Networkscited by 332
- 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 286
- 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 257
- 2018PAD-Net: Multi-Tasks Guided Prediction-and-Distillation Network for Simultaneous Depth Estimation and Scene Parsingcited by 224
- 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 168
- 2024Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvementscited by 46
- 2023A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformerscited by 39
- 2020Breaking the Curse of Space Explosion: Towards Efficient NAS with Curriculum Searchcited by 33
- 2024Loop Neural Networks for Parameter Sharingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Are Your Reasoning Models Reasoning or Guessing? A Mechanistic Analysis of Hierarchical Reasoning Modelscited by 10
- 2026Quantizing Recursive Reasoning Modelscited by 2
- 2025Complexity Agnostic Recursive Decomposition of Thoughtscited by 1
- 2026Recursive Vision Language Models for General Symbolic Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Dissecting Hierarchical Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Studycited by 0
- 2026Dissecting Hierarchical Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Study30 Aug 2026
- 2026Recursive Vision Language Models for General Symbolic Reasoning2 Aug 2026
- 2026Quantizing Recursive Reasoning Models25 Jun 2026
- 2026Are Your Reasoning Models Reasoning or Guessing? A Mechanistic Analysis of Hierarchical Reasoning Models15 Jan 2026
- 2025Complexity Agnostic Recursive Decomposition of Thoughts10 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AdaC-GRPO: Towards Mastering Long-Horizon Visual Sudoku Puzzles via Adaptive Curriculum Learning
- 2026Not Too Hard, Not Too Easy: Learning from Intermediate States for LLM Structured Reasoning
- 2026Form Follows Function: Recursive Stem Model
- 2026Energy-guided Recursive Model
- 2025Teaching Transformers to Solve Combinatorial Problems through Efficient Trial & Error
- 2026What Limits Recursive Reasoning Models: Optimization, Architecture and Test-Time Scaling
- 2026Probabilistic Tiny Recursive Model
- 2024Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles