Pixel-level Quality Assessment for Oriented Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern oriented object detectors typically predict a set of bounding boxes and select the top-ranked ones based on estimated localization quality. Achieving high detection performance requires that the estimated quality closely aligns with the actual localization accuracy. To this end, existing approaches predict the Intersection over Union (IoU) between the predicted and ground-truth (GT) boxes as a proxy for localization quality. However, box-level IoU prediction suffers from a structural coupling issue: since the predicted box is derived from the detector's internal estimation of the GT box, the predicted IoU--based on their similarity--can be overestimated for poorly localized boxes. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel Pixel-level Quality Assessment (PQA) framework, which replaces box-level IoU prediction with the integration of pixel-level spatial consistency. PQA measures the alignment between each pixel's relative position to the predicted box and its corresponding position to the GT box. By operating at the pixel level, PQA avoids directly comparing the predicted box with the estimated GT box, thereby eliminating the inherent similarity bias in box-level IoU prediction. Furthermore, we introduce a new integration metric that aggregates pixel-level spatial consistency into a unified quality score, yielding a more accurate approximation of the actual localization quality. Extensive experiments on HRSC2016 and DOTA demonstrate that PQA can be seamlessly integrated into various oriented object detectors, consistently improving performance (e.g., +5.96% AP50:95 on Rotated RetinaNet and +2.32% on STD).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
26 of 37 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,577
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 409
- 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 231
- 2021Oriented R-CNN for Object Detectioncited by 231
- 2019R3Det: Refined Single-Stage Detector with Feature Refinement for Rotating Objectcited by 194
- 2020Align Deep Features for Oriented Object Detectioncited by 187
- 2021OTA: Optimal Transport Assignment for Object Detectioncited by 178
14 more
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 176
- 2020Probabilistic Anchor Assignment with IoU Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 150
- 2019Gliding vertex on the horizontal bounding box for multi-oriented object detectioncited by 134
- 2019IoU Loss for 2D/3D Object Detectioncited by 128
- 2022MMRotate: A Rotated Object Detection Benchmark using PyTorchcited by 115
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
- 2022The KFIoU Loss for Rotated Object Detectioncited by 73
- 2022AO2-DETR: Arbitrary-Oriented Object Detection Transformercited by 55
- 2023Adaptive Rotated Convolution for Rotated Object Detectioncited by 51
- 2023Rank-DETR for High Quality Object Detectioncited by 50
- 2023Dynamic Coarse-to-Fine Learning for Oriented Tiny Object Detectioncited by 43
- 2021Rank & Sort Loss for Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 22
- 2021Gaussian Bounding Boxes and Probabilistic Intersection-over-Union for Object Detectioncited by 18
- 2023Correlation Loss: Enforcing Correlation between Classification and Localizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.