Correlation Loss: Enforcing Correlation between Classification and Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Object detectors are conventionally trained by a weighted sum of classification and localization losses. Recent studies (e.g., predicting IoU with an auxiliary head, Generalized Focal Loss, Rank & Sort Loss) have shown that forcing these two loss terms to interact with each other in non-conventional ways creates a useful inductive bias and improves performance. Inspired by these works, we focus on the correlation between classification and localization and make two main contributions: (i) We provide an analysis about the effects of correlation between classification and localization tasks in object detectors. We identify why correlation affects the performance of various NMS-based and NMS-free detectors, and we devise measures to evaluate the effect of correlation and use them to analyze common detectors. (ii) Motivated by our observations, e.g., that NMS-free detectors can also benefit from correlation, we propose Correlation Loss, a novel plug-in loss function that improves the performance of various object detectors by directly optimizing correlation coefficients: E.g., Correlation Loss on Sparse R-CNN, an NMS-free method, yields 1.6 AP gain on COCO and 1.8 AP gain on Cityscapes dataset. Our best model on Sparse R-CNN reaches 51.0 AP without test-time augmentation on COCO test-dev, reaching state-of-the-art. Code is available at https://github.com/fehmikahraman/CorrLoss
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2023.
Builds on
32 of 38 references.
References · 32
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
- 2018Deformable ConvNets v2: More Deformable, Better Resultscited by 666
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
20 more
- 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
- 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 441
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
- 2019Mask Scoring R-CNNcited by 265
- 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 230
- 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
- 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 196
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 174
- 2020Rethinking Transformer-based Set Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 156
- 2020Probabilistic Anchor Assignment with IoU Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 150
- 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
- 2019CARAFE: Content-Aware ReAssembly of FEaturescited by 119
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
- 2021Sparse DETR: Efficient End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Sparsitycited by 98
- 2020What Makes for End-to-End Object Detection?cited by 47
- 2022A Dual Weighting Label Assignment Scheme for Object Detectioncited by 26
- 2020A Ranking-based, Balanced Loss Function Unifying Classification and Localisation in Object Detectioncited by 25
- 2020AP-Loss for Accurate One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 24
- 2021Rank & Sort Loss for Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 22
- 2020One Metric to Measure them All: Localisation Recall Precision (LRP) for Evaluating Visual Detection Taskscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Rank-DETR for High Quality Object Detectioncited by 49
- 2023MoCaE: Mixture of Calibrated Experts Significantly Improves Object Detectioncited by 17
- 2023RTrack: Accelerating Convergence for Visual Object Tracking via Pseudo-Boxes Explorationcited by 0
- 2025Pixel-level Quality Assessment for Oriented Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Pixel-level Quality Assessment for Oriented Object Detection11 Nov 2025
- 2023Rank-DETR for High Quality Object Detection13 Oct 2023
- 2023MoCaE: Mixture of Calibrated Experts Significantly Improves Object Detection26 Sep 2023
- 2023RTrack: Accelerating Convergence for Visual Object Tracking via Pseudo-Boxes Exploration23 Sep 2023