mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Correlation Loss: Enforcing Correlation between Classification and Localization

arXiv 2301.01019 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Object detectors are conventionally trained by a weighted sum of classification and localization losses. Recent studies (e.g., predicting IoU with an auxiliary head, Generalized Focal Loss, Rank & Sort Loss) have shown that forcing these two loss terms to interact with each other in non-conventional ways creates a useful inductive bias and improves performance. Inspired by these works, we focus on the correlation between classification and localization and make two main contributions: (i) We provide an analysis about the effects of correlation between classification and localization tasks in object detectors. We identify why correlation affects the performance of various NMS-based and NMS-free detectors, and we devise measures to evaluate the effect of correlation and use them to analyze common detectors. (ii) Motivated by our observations, e.g., that NMS-free detectors can also benefit from correlation, we propose Correlation Loss, a novel plug-in loss function that improves the performance of various object detectors by directly optimizing correlation coefficients: E.g., Correlation Loss on Sparse R-CNN, an NMS-free method, yields 1.6 AP gain on COCO and 1.8 AP gain on Cityscapes dataset. Our best model on Sparse R-CNN reaches 51.0 AP without test-time augmentation on COCO test-dev, reaching state-of-the-art. Code is available at https://github.com/fehmikahraman/CorrLoss

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2023.

Builds on

32 of 38 references.

References · 32

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  6. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  8. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  9. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  10. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  11. 2018Deformable ConvNets v2: More Deformable, Better Resultscited by 666
  12. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
20 more
  1. 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
  2. 2019YOLACT: Real-time Instance Segmentationcited by 441
  3. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  4. 2019Mask Scoring R-CNNcited by 265
  5. 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 230
  6. 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
  7. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 196
  8. 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 174
  9. 2020Rethinking Transformer-based Set Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 156
  10. 2020Probabilistic Anchor Assignment with IoU Prediction for Object Detectioncited by 150
  11. 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
  12. 2019CARAFE: Content-Aware ReAssembly of FEaturescited by 119
  13. 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
  14. 2021Sparse DETR: Efficient End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Sparsitycited by 98
  15. 2020What Makes for End-to-End Object Detection?cited by 47
  16. 2022A Dual Weighting Label Assignment Scheme for Object Detectioncited by 26
  17. 2020A Ranking-based, Balanced Loss Function Unifying Classification and Localisation in Object Detectioncited by 25
  18. 2020AP-Loss for Accurate One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 24
  19. 2021Rank & Sort Loss for Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 22
  20. 2020One Metric to Measure them All: Localisation Recall Precision (LRP) for Evaluating Visual Detection Taskscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.