mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CC30k: A Citation Contexts Dataset for Reproducibility-Oriented Sentiment Analysis

arXiv 2511.07790 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2025cs.DL cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sentiments about the reproducibility of cited papers in downstream literature offer community perspectives and have shown as a promising signal of the actual reproducibility of published findings. To train effective models to effectively predict reproducibility-oriented sentiments and further systematically study their correlation with reproducibility, we introduce the CC30k dataset, comprising a total of 30,734 citation contexts in machine learning papers. Each citation context is labeled with one of three reproducibility-oriented sentiment labels: Positive, Negative, or Neutral, reflecting the cited paper's perceived reproducibility or replicability. Of these, 25,829 are labeled through crowdsourcing, supplemented with negatives generated through a controlled pipeline to counter the scarcity of negative labels. Unlike traditional sentiment analysis datasets, CC30k focuses on reproducibility-oriented sentiments, addressing a research gap in resources for computational reproducibility studies. The dataset was created through a pipeline that includes robust data cleansing, careful crowd selection, and thorough validation. The resulting dataset achieves a labeling accuracy of 94%. We then demonstrated that the performance of three large language models significantly improves on the reproducibility-oriented sentiment classification after fine-tuning using our dataset. The dataset lays the foundation for large-scale assessments of the reproducibility of machine learning papers. The CC30k dataset and the Jupyter notebooks used to produce and analyze the dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/CC30k .

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

Builds on

21 of 63 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  4. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  6. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  7. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  8. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  9. 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 430
  10. 2019Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasetscited by 299
  11. 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 249
  12. 2019Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publicationscited by 130
9 more
  1. 2023The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platformcited by 118
  2. 2019A Step Toward Quantifying Independently Reproducible Machine Learning Researchcited by 77
  3. 2024Verifiable Generation with Subsentence-Level Fine-Grained Citationscited by 15
  4. 2024Reproducibility, Replicability, and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computingcited by 8
  5. 2024Context-Enhanced Language Models for Generating Multi-Paper Citationscited by 5
  6. 2023A Study on Reproducibility and Replicability of Table Structure Recognition Methodscited by 4
  7. 2020Language Representation Models for Fine-Grained Sentiment Classificationcited by 2
  8. 2023Laying foundations to quantify the "Effort of Reproducibility"cited by 2
  9. 2024Can citations tell us about a paper's reproducibility? A case study of machine learning paperscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.