Scalable Verification of Neural Control Barrier Functions Using Linear Bound Propagation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Control barrier functions (CBFs) are a popular tool for safety certification of nonlinear dynamical control systems. Recently, CBFs represented as neural networks have shown great promise due to their expressiveness and applicability to a broad class of dynamics and safety constraints. However, verifying that a trained neural network is indeed a valid CBF is a computational bottleneck that limits the size of the networks that can be used. To overcome this limitation, we present a novel framework for verifying neural CBFs based on piecewise linear upper and lower bounds on the conditions required for a neural network to be a CBF. Our approach is rooted in linear bound propagation (LBP) for neural networks, which we extend to compute bounds on the gradients of the network. Combined with McCormick relaxation, we derive linear upper and lower bounds on the CBF conditions, thereby eliminating the need for computationally expensive verification procedures. Our approach applies to arbitrary control-affine systems and a broad range of nonlinear activation functions. To reduce conservatism, we develop a parallelizable refinement strategy that adaptively refines the regions over which these bounds are computed. Our approach scales to larger neural networks than state-of-the-art verification procedures for CBFs, as demonstrated by our numerical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.
Builds on
22 of 44 references.
References · 22
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 332
- 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 261
- 2020Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifierscited by 183
- 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 148
- 2023The Safety Filter: A Unified View of Safety-Critical Control in Autonomous Systemscited by 77
- 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
- 2022Efficiently Computing Local Lipschitz Constants of Neural Networks via Bound Propagationcited by 45
- 2022Robust Explanation Constraints for Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2022Safety Certification for Stochastic Systems via Neural Barrier Functionscited by 22
- 2022Learning Control Policies for Stochastic Systems with Reach-avoid Guaranteescited by 21
- 2023Fossil 2.0: Formal Certificate Synthesis for the Verification and Control of Dynamical Modelscited by 15
10 more
- 2019Parameter Synthesis for Markov Models: Covering the Parameter Spacecited by 14
- 2023Exact Verification of ReLU Neural Control Barrier Functionscited by 14
- 2021Verification and Synthesis of Control Barrier Functionscited by 13
- 2024Verification of Neural Control Barrier Functions with Symbolic Derivative Bounds Propagationcited by 12
- 2023Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2019Control Barrier Functions for Mechanical Systems: Theory and Application to Robotic Graspingcited by 8
- 2021Robust Control Barrier Functions under High Relative Degree and Input Constraints for Satellite Trajectoriescited by 8
- 2014Abstraction of Elementary Hybrid Systems by Variable Transformationcited by 4
- 2024Policy Verification in Stochastic Dynamical Systems Using Logarithmic Neural Certificatescited by 3
- 2025Certified Neural Approximations of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.