Control Barrier Functions for Mechanical Systems: Theory and Application to Robotic Grasping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Control barrier functions have been demonstrated to be a useful method of ensuring constraint satisfaction for a wide class of controllers, however existing results are mostly restricted to continuous time systems of relative degree one. Mechanical systems, including robots, are typically second-order systems in which the control occurs at the force/torque level. These systems have velocity and position constraints (i.e. relative degree two) that are vital for safety and/or task execution. Additionally, mechanical systems are typically controlled digitally as sampled-data systems. The contribution of this work is two-fold. First, is the development of novel, robust control barrier functions that ensure constraint satisfaction for relative degree two, sampled-data systems in the presence of model uncertainty. Second, is the application of the proposed method to the challenging problem of robotic grasping in which a robotic hand must ensure an object remains inside the grasp while manipulating it to a desired reference trajectory. A grasp constraint satisfying controller is proposed that can admit existing nominal manipulation controllers from the literature, while simultaneously ensuring no slip, no over-extension (e.g. singular configurations), and no rolling off of the fingertips. Simulation and experimental results validate the proposed control for the robotic hand application.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025VLSA: Vision-Language-Action Models with Plug-and-Play Safety Constraint Layercited by 34
- 2024VoicePilot: Harnessing LLMs as Speech Interfaces for Physically Assistive Robotscited by 16
- 2023Exact Verification of ReLU Neural Control Barrier Functionscited by 14
- 2024CBF-LLM: Safe Control for LLM Alignmentcited by 9
- 2022Differentiable Predictive Control with Safety Guarantees: A Control Barrier Function Approachcited by 6
- 2025Scalable Verification of Neural Control Barrier Functions Using Linear Bound Propagationcited by 2
- 2025Optimal Parameter Adaptation for Safety-Critical Control via Safe Barrier Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025Control Barrier Function for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025VLSA: Vision-Language-Action Models with Plug-and-Play Safety Constraint Layer9 Dec 2025
- 2025Scalable Verification of Neural Control Barrier Functions Using Linear Bound Propagation9 Nov 2025
- 2025Control Barrier Function for Aligning Large Language Models5 Nov 2025
- 2025Optimal Parameter Adaptation for Safety-Critical Control via Safe Barrier Bayesian Optimization25 Mar 2025
- 2024CBF-LLM: Safe Control for LLM Alignment28 Aug 2024
- 2024VoicePilot: Harnessing LLMs as Speech Interfaces for Physically Assistive Robots5 Apr 2024
- 2023Exact Verification of ReLU Neural Control Barrier Functions13 Oct 2023
- 2022Differentiable Predictive Control with Safety Guarantees: A Control Barrier Function Approach3 Aug 2022