mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

3dSAGER: Geospatial Entity Resolution over 3D Objects (Technical Report)

arXiv 2511.06300 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Urban environments are continuously mapped and modeled by various data collection platforms, including satellites, unmanned aerial vehicles and street cameras. The growing availability of 3D geospatial data from multiple modalities has introduced new opportunities and challenges for integrating spatial knowledge at scale, particularly in high-impact domains such as urban planning and rapid disaster management. Geospatial entity resolution is the task of identifying matching spatial objects across different datasets, often collected independently under varying conditions. Existing approaches typically rely on spatial proximity, textual metadata, or external identifiers to determine correspondence. While useful, these signals are often unavailable, unreliable, or misaligned, especially in cross-source scenarios. To address these limitations, we shift the focus to the intrinsic geometry of 3D spatial objects and present 3dSAGER (3D Spatial-Aware Geospatial Entity Resolution), an end-to-end pipeline for geospatial entity resolution over 3D objects. 3dSAGER introduces a novel, spatial-reference-independent featurization mechanism that captures intricate geometric characteristics of matching pairs, enabling robust comparison even across datasets with incompatible coordinate systems where traditional spatial methods fail. As a key component of 3dSAGER, we also propose a new lightweight and interpretable blocking method, BKAFI, that leverages a trained model to efficiently generate high-recall candidate sets. We validate 3dSAGER through extensive experiments on real-world urban datasets, demonstrating significant gains in both accuracy and efficiency over strong baselines. Our empirical study further dissects the contributions of each component, providing insights into their impact and the overall design choices.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.

Builds on

19 of 83 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  5. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
  6. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 143
  7. 2017DeepER -- Deep Entity Resolutioncited by 54
  8. 2023Entity Matching using Large Language Modelscited by 31
  9. 2019ZeroER: Entity Resolution using Zero Labeled Examplescited by 28
  10. 2021Automated 3D reconstruction of LoD2 and LoD1 models for all 10 million buildings of the Netherlandscited by 14
  11. 2019AutoBlock: A Hands-off Blocking Framework for Entity Matchingcited by 12
  12. 2021Deep Indexed Active Learning for Matching Heterogeneous Entity Representationscited by 9
7 more
  1. 2022PromptEM: Prompt-tuning for Low-resource Generalized Entity Matchingcited by 9
  2. 2024CRASAR-U-DROIDs: A Large Scale Benchmark Dataset for Building Alignment and Damage Assessment in Georectified sUAS Imagerycited by 9
  3. 2019CityJSON: a compact and easy-to-use encoding of the CityGML data modelcited by 8
  4. 2019A Survey of Blocking and Filtering Techniques for Entity Resolutioncited by 8
  5. 2021A volumetric change detection framework using UAV oblique photogrammetry - A case study of ultra-high-resolution monitoring of progressive building collapsecited by 7
  6. 2023SC-Block: Supervised Contrastive Blocking within Entity Resolution Pipelinescited by 6
  7. 2023The Battleship Approach to the Low Resource Entity Matching Problemcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.