mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prompting Neural-Guided Equation Discovery Based on Residuals

arXiv 2511.05586 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural-guided equation discovery systems use a data set as prompt and predict an equation that describes the data set without extensive search. However, if the equation does not meet the user's expectations, there are few options for getting other equation suggestions without intensive work with the system. To fill this gap, we propose Residuals for Equation Discovery (RED), a post-processing method that improves a given equation in a targeted manner, based on its residuals. By parsing the initial equation to a syntax tree, we can use node-based calculation rules to compute the residual for each subequation of the initial equation. It is then possible to use this residual as new target variable in the original data set and generate a new prompt. If, with the new prompt, the equation discovery system suggests a subequation better than the old subequation on a validation set, we replace the latter by the former. RED is usable with any equation discovery system, is fast to calculate, and is easy to extend for new mathematical operations. In experiments on 53 equations from the Feynman benchmark, we show that it not only helps to improve all tested neural-guided systems, but also all tested classical genetic programming systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 550
  4. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  6. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  7. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  8. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  9. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
  10. 2024LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Modelscited by 117
  11. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 72
  12. 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
3 more
  1. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-Searchcited by 40
  2. 2023Symbolic Regression via Control Variable Genetic Programmingcited by 8
  3. 2023Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regressioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.