mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression

arXiv 2309.07934 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2023cs.NE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic regression, as one of the most crucial tasks in AI for science, discovers governing equations from experimental data. Popular approaches based on genetic programming, Monte Carlo tree search, or deep reinforcement learning learn symbolic regression from a fixed dataset. They require massive datasets and long training time especially when learning complex equations involving many variables. Recently, Control Variable Genetic Programming (CVGP) has been introduced which accelerates the regression process by discovering equations from designed control variable experiments. However, the set of experiments is fixed a-priori in CVGP and we observe that sub-optimal selection of experiment schedules delay the discovery process significantly. To overcome this limitation, we propose Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming (Racing-CVGP), which carries out multiple experiment schedules simultaneously. A selection scheme similar to that used in selecting good symbolic equations in the genetic programming process is implemented to ensure that promising experiment schedules eventually win over the average ones. The unfavorable schedules are terminated early to save time for the promising ones. We evaluate Racing-CVGP on several synthetic and real-world datasets corresponding to true physics laws. We demonstrate that Racing-CVGP outperforms CVGP and a series of symbolic regressors which discover equations from fixed datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.

Builds on

17 of 54 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 540
  2. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 298
  3. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 211
  4. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 196
  5. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 186
  6. 2018Learning to Branchcited by 78
  7. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 69
  8. 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchcited by 63
  9. 2020A Bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problemscited by 61
  10. 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search based Variable Selection for High Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 37
  11. 2018Neural Program Synthesis with Priority Queue Trainingcited by 24
  12. 2022Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regressioncited by 18
5 more
  1. 2022GSR: A Generalized Symbolic Regression Approachcited by 11
  2. 2017Elite Bases Regression: A Real-time Algorithm for Symbolic Regressioncited by 9
  3. 2019Learning Variable Ordering Heuristics for Solving Constraint Satisfaction Problemscited by 8
  4. 2023Symbolic Regression via Control Variable Genetic Programmingcited by 8
  5. 2022Neural-Network-Directed Genetic Programmer for Discovery of Governing Equationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.