mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Joint Regularization and Calibration in Deep Ensembles

arXiv 2511.04160 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep ensembles are a powerful tool in machine learning, improving both model performance and uncertainty calibration. While ensembles are typically formed by training and tuning models individually, evidence suggests that jointly tuning the ensemble can lead to better performance. This paper investigates the impact of jointly tuning weight decay, temperature scaling, and early stopping on both predictive performance and uncertainty quantification. Additionally, we propose a partially overlapping holdout strategy as a practical compromise between enabling joint evaluation and maximizing the use of data for training. Our results demonstrate that jointly tuning the ensemble generally matches or improves performance, with significant variation in effect size across different tasks and metrics. We highlight the trade-offs between individual and joint optimization in deep ensemble training, with the overlapping holdout strategy offering an attractive practical solution. We believe our findings provide valuable insights and guidance for practitioners looking to optimize deep ensemble models. Code is available at: https://github.com/lauritsf/ensemble-optimality-gap

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.

Builds on

25 of 48 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  6. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  7. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
  8. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
  9. 2020Training independent subnetworks for robust predictioncited by 177
  10. 2020Efficient and Scalable Bayesian Neural Nets with Rank-1 Factorscited by 171
  11. 2020Hyperparameter Ensembles for Robustness and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 150
  12. 2015Why M Heads are Better than One: Training a Diverse Ensemble of Deep Networkscited by 139
13 more
  1. 2020Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensemblescited by 139
  2. 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 113
  3. 2021Causal Attention for Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Classificationcited by 108
  4. 2022Plex: Towards Reliability using Pretrained Large Model Extensionscited by 102
  5. 2023A Unified Theory of Diversity in Ensemble Learningcited by 71
  6. 2022Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferabilitycited by 70
  7. 2022Deep Ensembles Work, But Are They Necessary?cited by 63
  8. 2020Combining Ensembles and Data Augmentation can Harm your Calibrationcited by 44
  9. 2019Maximizing Overall Diversity for Improved Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Ensemblescited by 30
  10. 2023Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusioncited by 23
  11. 2023Pathologies of Predictive Diversity in Deep Ensemblescited by 16
  12. 2021Should Ensemble Members Be Calibrated?cited by 11
  13. 2024Boosting Deep Ensembles with Learning Rate Tuningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.