U2F: Encouraging SWE-Agent to Seize Novelty without Losing Feasibility
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in software engineering tasks, yet most existing LLM-based SWE-Agents mainly tackle well-defined problems using conventional methods, often overlooking alternative or innovative solutions beyond their predefined frameworks. This limitation is evident in open-world software environments, where emerging challenges transcend established paradigms. We propose U2F (Unknown Unknowns to Functional solutions), a cognitive-inspired, uncertainty-embracing multi-agent framework that systematically surfaces "Unknown Unknowns" - novel solution pathways absent from initial formulations but holding innovative potential. U2F consists of two key components: (1) a Discovery-Exploration-Integration agent system for uncovering and synthesizing potential solutions, and (2) cognitive enhancement mechanisms across three dimensions: cross-domain analogical reasoning, reverse thinking, and external validation, which strategically reframe and extend conventional solution boundaries. Applied to 218 real-world software enabler stories curated from authentic engineering tasks, U2F achieved notable improvements: human experts reported a 14 percent increase in overall novelty, 51 percent improvement in semantic novelty, and stable feasibility (4.02/5.0), corroborated by an LLM-based evaluator. These results highlight the potential of embracing uncertainty as a catalyst for innovation in software engineering.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
8 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 7
- 2025Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanismscited by 48
- 2023Advancing Requirements Engineering through Generative AI: Assessing the Role of LLMscited by 42
- 2024What Should We Engineer in Prompts? Training Humans in Requirement-Driven LLM Usecited by 24
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for the Quality Assurance of Software Requirementscited by 15
- 2023Insights into Classifying and Mitigating LLMs' Hallucinationscited by 6
- 2024AI based Multiagent Approach for Requirements Elicitation and Analysiscited by 6
- 2023Knowns and Unknowns: An Experience Report on Discovering Tacit Knowledge of Maritime Surveyorscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories
- 2024SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinement
- 2024LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead
- 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
- 2026Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report
- 2026Socratic-SWE: Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Trace-Derived Agent Skills
- 2026From Task Solving to Robust Real-World Adaptation in LLM Agents
- 2024Agents in Software Engineering: Survey, Landscape, and Vision