Segmentation Beyond Defaults: Asymmetrical Byte Pair Encoding for Optimal Machine Translation Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing Machine Translation (MT) research often suggests a single, fixed set of hyperparameters for word segmentation models, symmetric Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), which applies the same number of merge operations (NMO) to train tokenizers for both source and target languages. However, we demonstrate that this uniform approach doesn't guarantee optimal MT performance across different language pairs and data sizes. This work investigates BPE segmentation recipes across various data volumes and language pairs to evaluate MT system performance. We find that utilizing asymmetric BPE, where the source and target languages have different NMOs, significantly improves results over the symmetric approach, especially in low-resource settings (50K, 100K, and 500K sentence pairs). Specifically, asymmetric BPE yield statistically significant (p<0.05) average gains of 5.32, 4.46, and 0.7 CHRF++ on English-Hindi in low-resource setups (50K, 100K, and 500K sentence pairs, respectively). We validated this trend across six additional language pairs (English and Telugu, Shona, Norwegian, Kyrgyz, Hausa, and Inuktitut), observing statistically significant improvement in 10 out of 12 systems compared to symmetric BPE. Our findings indicate a high NMO for the source (4K to 32K) and a low NMO for the target (0.5K to 2K) provides optimal results, particularly benefiting low-resource MT.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 42 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
- 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
- 2021Samanantar: The Largest Publicly Available Parallel Corpora Collection for 11 Indic Languagescited by 133
- 2021Many-to-English Machine Translation Tools, Data, and Pretrained Modelscited by 31
- 2019A Call for Prudent Choice of Subword Merge Operations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 30
- 2018Revisiting Character-Based Neural Machine Translation with Capacity and Compressioncited by 28
- 2025Parity-Aware Byte-Pair Encoding: Improving Cross-lingual Fairness in Tokenizationcited by 18
6 more
- 2017Stronger Baselines for Trustable Results in Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
- 2024Transformers for Low-Resource Languages: Is F'eidir Linn!cited by 9
- 2024Investigating Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: Using Bavarian as a Case Studycited by 5
- 2020Using Multiple Subwords to Improve English-Esperanto Automated Literary Translation Qualitycited by 3
- 2025Data Augmentation With Back translation for Low Resource languages: A case of English and Lugandacited by 3
- 2018Character-Aware Decoder for Translation into Morphologically Rich Languagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.