mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uncertainty Guided Online Ensemble for Non-stationary Data Streams in Fusion Science

arXiv 2511.02092 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI physics.plasm-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) is poised to play a pivotal role in the development and operation of next-generation fusion devices. Fusion data shows non-stationary behavior with distribution drifts, resulted by both experimental evolution and machine wear-and-tear. ML models assume stationary distribution and fail to maintain performance when encountered with such non-stationary data streams. Online learning techniques have been leveraged in other domains, however it has been largely unexplored for fusion applications. In this paper, we present an application of online learning to continuously adapt to drifting data stream for prediction of Toroidal Field (TF) coils deflection at the DIII-D fusion facility. The results demonstrate that online learning is critical to maintain ML model performance and reduces error by 80% compared to a static model. Moreover, traditional online learning can suffer from short-term performance degradation as ground truth is not available before making the predictions. As such, we propose an uncertainty guided online ensemble method to further improve the performance. The Deep Gaussian Process Approximation (DGPA) technique is leveraged for calibrated uncertainty estimation and the uncertainty values are then used to guide a meta-algorithm that produces predictions based on an ensemble of learners trained on different horizon of historical data. The DGPA also provides uncertainty estimation along with the predictions for decision makers. The online ensemble and the proposed uncertainty guided online ensemble reduces predictions error by about 6%, and 10% respectively over standard single model based online learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  5. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  6. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
  7. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  8. 2018Online Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 203
  9. 2020Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensemblescited by 138
  10. 2021Uncertainty Toolbox: an Open-Source Library for Assessing, Visualizing, and Improving Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 57
  11. 2021A Lightweight Concept Drift Detection and Adaptation Framework for IoT Data Streamscited by 28
  12. 2023Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Engineering Design and Health Prognostics: A Tutorialcited by 27
3 more
  1. 2024Proactive Model Adaptation Against Concept Drift for Online Time Series Forecastingcited by 18
  2. 2021Scenario adaptive disruption prediction study for next generation burning-plasma tokamakscited by 5
  3. 2023Uncertainty Aware Deep Learning for Particle Acceleratorscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.