mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

L2T-Tune:LLM-Guided Hybrid Database Tuning with LHS and TD3

arXiv 2511.01602 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.DB cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Configuration tuning is critical for database performance. Although recent advancements in database tuning have shown promising results in throughput and latency improvement, challenges remain. First, the vast knob space makes direct optimization unstable and slow to converge. Second, reinforcement learning pipelines often lack effective warm-start guidance and require long offline training. Third, transferability is limited: when hardware or workloads change, existing models typically require substantial retraining to recover performance. To address these limitations, we propose L2T-Tune, a new LLM-guided hybrid database tuning framework that features a three-stage pipeline: Stage one performs a warm start that simultaneously generates uniform samples across the knob space and logs them into a shared pool; Stage two leverages a large language model to mine and prioritize tuning hints from manuals and community documents for rapid convergence. Stage three uses the warm-start sample pool to reduce the dimensionality of knobs and state features, then fine-tunes the configuration with the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient algorithm. We conduct experiments on L2T-Tune and the state-of-the-art models. Compared with the best-performing alternative, our approach improves performance by an average of 37.1% across all workloads, and by up to 73% on TPC-C. Compared with models trained with reinforcement learning, it achieves rapid convergence in the offline tuning stage on a single server. Moreover, during the online tuning stage, it only takes 30 steps to achieve best results.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

13 of 40 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  3. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  4. 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 230
  5. 2017The Case for Learned Index Structurescited by 188
  6. 2019ALEX: An Updatable Adaptive Learned Indexcited by 43
  7. 2018FITing-Tree: A Data-aware Index Structurecited by 30
  8. 2017BestConfig: Tapping the Performance Potential of Systems via Automatic Configuration Tuningcited by 25
  9. 2021DB-BERT: a Database Tuning Tool that "Reads the Manual"cited by 19
  10. 2024λ-Tune: Harnessing Large Language Models for Automated Database System Tuningcited by 19
  11. 2021Distributed Learning Systems with First-order Methodscited by 17
  12. 2022Towards Dynamic and Safe Configuration Tuning for Cloud Databasescited by 16
1 more
  1. 2024E2ETune: End-to-End Knob Tuning via Fine-tuned Generative Language Modelcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Is Large Language Model Good at Database Knob Tuning? A Comprehensive Experimental Evaluation
  2. 2025DemoTuner: Automatic Performance Tuning for Database Management Systems Based on Demonstration Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024EE-Tuning: An Economical yet Scalable Solution for Tuning Early-Exit Large Language Models
  4. 2024LR-SQL: A Supervised Fine-Tuning Method for Text2SQL Tasks under Low-Resource Scenarios
  5. 2024KnobTree: Intelligent Database Parameter Configuration via Explainable Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024ROUTE: Robust Multitask Tuning and Collaboration for Text-to-SQL
  7. 2025Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout Replay
  8. 2025LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning