mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DEEPAMBIGQA: Ambiguous Multi-hop Questions for Benchmarking LLM Answer Completeness

arXiv 2511.01323 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) with integrated search tools show strong promise in open-domain question answering (QA), yet they often struggle to produce complete answer set to complex questions such as Which actor from the film Heat won at least one Academy Award?, which requires (1) distinguishing between multiple films sharing the same title and (2) reasoning across a large set of actors to gather and integrate evidence. Existing QA benchmarks rarely evaluate both challenges jointly. To address this, we introduce DeepAmbigQAGen, an automatic data generation pipeline that constructs QA tasks grounded in text corpora and linked knowledge graph, generating natural and verifiable questions that systematically embed name ambiguity and multi-step reasoning. Based on this, we build DeepAmbigQA, a dataset of 3,600 questions requiring multi-hop reasoning and half of them explicit name ambiguity resolving. Experiments reveal that, even state-of-the-art GPT-5 show incomplete answers, achieving only 0.13 exact match on ambiguous questions and 0.21 on non-ambiguous questions. These findings highlight the need for more robust QA systems aimed at information gathering and answer completeness.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

15 of 25 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  2. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  3. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  4. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
  5. 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 385
  6. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
  7. 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 231
  8. 2017Variational Reasoning for Question Answering with Knowledge Graphcited by 170
  9. 2020Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Basescited by 169
  10. 2024FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Researchcited by 165
  11. 2020KQA Pro: A Dataset with Explicit Compositional Programs for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Basecited by 76
  12. 2025ResearchQA: Evaluating Scholarly Question Answering at Scale Across 75 Fields with Survey-Mined Questions and Rubricscited by 44
3 more
  1. 2025MoNaCo: More Natural and Complex Questions for Reasoning Across Dozens of Documentscited by 20
  2. 2025CondAmbigQA: A Benchmark and Dataset for Conditional Ambiguous Question Answeringcited by 15
  3. 2024WebQuest: A Benchmark for Multimodal QA on Web Page Sequencescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Tail Knowledge
  2. 2024FanOutQA: A Multi-Hop, Multi-Document Question Answering Benchmark for Large Language Models
  3. 2025StepChain GraphRAG: Reasoning Over Knowledge Graphs for Multi-Hop Question Answering
  4. 2025KG-o1: Enhancing Multi-hop Question Answering in Large Language Models via Knowledge Graph Integration
  5. 2023Tree of Clarifications: Answering Ambiguous Questions with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  6. 2023Multimodal Multi-Hop Question Answering Through a Conversation Between Tools and Efficiently Finetuned Large Language Models
  7. 2022UniKGQA: Unified Retrieval and Reasoning for Solving Multi-hop Question Answering Over Knowledge Graph
  8. 2026Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models