Merlin L48 Spectrogram Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the single-positive multi-label (SPML) setting, each image in a dataset is labeled with the presence of a single class, while the true presence of other classes remains unknown. The challenge is to narrow the performance gap between this partially-labeled setting and fully-supervised learning, which often requires a significant annotation budget. Prior SPML methods were developed and benchmarked on synthetic datasets created by randomly sampling single positive labels from fully-annotated datasets like Pascal VOC, COCO, NUS-WIDE, and CUB200. However, this synthetic approach does not reflect real-world scenarios and fails to capture the fine-grained complexities that can lead to difficult misclassifications. In this work, we introduce the L48 dataset, a fine-grained, real-world multi-label dataset derived from recordings of bird sounds. L48 provides a natural SPML setting with single-positive annotations on a challenging, fine-grained domain, as well as two extended settings in which domain priors give access to additional negative labels. We benchmark existing SPML methods on L48 and observe significant performance differences compared to synthetic datasets and analyze method weaknesses, underscoring the need for more realistic and difficult benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2025.
Builds on
22 of 42 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 127
- 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
- 2021Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labelscited by 81
- 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 59
- 2017Multi-Label Learning with Global and Local Label Correlationcited by 40
- 2022Large Loss Matters in Weakly Supervised Multi-Label Classificationcited by 38
- 2021Simple and Robust Loss Design for Multi-Label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 30
10 more
- 2022Source-free Video Domain Adaptation by Learning Temporal Consistency for Action Recognitioncited by 28
- 2022Acknowledging the Unknown for Multi-label Learning with Single Positive Labelscited by 24
- 2022One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancementcited by 22
- 2022Spatial Consistency Loss for Training Multi-Label Classifiers from Single-Label Annotationscited by 17
- 2025The iNaturalist Sounds Datasetcited by 17
- 2018NIPS4Bplus: a richly annotated birdsong audio datasetcited by 14
- 2022Exploring Fine-Grained Audiovisual Categorization with the SSW60 Datasetcited by 12
- 2022G2NetPL: Generic Game-Theoretic Network for Partial-Label Image Classificationcited by 7
- 2022PLMCL: Partial-Label Momentum Curriculum Learning for Multi-Label Image Classificationcited by 5
- 2023Understanding Label Bias in Single Positive Multi-Label Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.