Understanding Label Bias in Single Positive Multi-Label Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Annotating data for multi-label classification is prohibitively expensive because every category of interest must be confirmed to be present or absent. Recent work on single positive multi-label (SPML) learning shows that it is possible to train effective multi-label classifiers using only one positive label per image. However, the standard benchmarks for SPML are derived from traditional multi-label classification datasets by retaining one positive label for each training example (chosen uniformly at random) and discarding all other labels. In realistic settings it is not likely that positive labels are chosen uniformly at random. This work introduces protocols for studying label bias in SPML and provides new empirical results.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
11 of 17 references.
References · 11
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2016CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 190
- 2021Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labelscited by 81
- 2014CNN: Single-label to Multi-labelcited by 63
- 2022Large Loss Matters in Weakly Supervised Multi-Label Classificationcited by 38
- 2021Simple and Robust Loss Design for Multi-Label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 30
- 2022Acknowledging the Unknown for Multi-label Learning with Single Positive Labelscited by 24
- 2022One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancementcited by 22
- 2022Spatial Consistency Loss for Training Multi-Label Classifiers from Single-Label Annotationscited by 17
- 2022G2NetPL: Generic Game-Theoretic Network for Partial-Label Image Classificationcited by 7
- 2022PLMCL: Partial-Label Momentum Curriculum Learning for Multi-Label Image Classificationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.