mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PDE-SHARP: PDE Solver Hybrids through Analysis and Refinement Passes

arXiv 2511.00183 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current LLM-driven approaches using test-time computing to generate PDE solvers execute a large number of solver samples to identify high-accuracy solvers. These paradigms are especially costly for complex PDEs requiring substantial computational resources for numerical evaluation. We introduce PDE-SHARP, a framework to reduce computational costs by replacing expensive scientific computation by cheaper LLM inference that achieves superior solver accuracy with 60-75% fewer computational evaluations. PDE-SHARP employs three stages: (1) Analysis: mathematical chain-of-thought analysis including PDE classification, solution type detection, and stability analysis; (2) Genesis: solver generation based on mathematical insights from the previous stage; and (3) Synthesis: collaborative selection-hybridization tournaments in which LLM judges iteratively refine implementations through flexible performance feedback. To generate high-quality solvers, PDE-SHARP requires fewer than 13 solver evaluations on average compared to 30+ for baseline methods, improving accuracy uniformly across tested PDEs by 4× on average, and demonstrates robust performance across LLM architectures, from general-purpose to specialized reasoning models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2025.

Builds on

28 of 67 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  5. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  6. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  7. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  8. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
  9. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  10. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  11. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  12. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
16 more
  1. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  2. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  3. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
  4. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 206
  5. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 186
  6. 2024SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientistscited by 172
  7. 2024DPOT: Auto-Regressive Denoising Operator Transformer for Large-Scale PDE Pre-Trainingcited by 137
  8. 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 136
  9. 2018Deep Learning of Vortex Induced Vibrationscited by 74
  10. 2024PirateNets: Physics-informed Deep Learning with Residual Adaptive Networkscited by 70
  11. 2024MathCoder2: Better Math Reasoning from Continued Pretraining on Model-translated Mathematical Codecited by 39
  12. 2025CodePDE: An Inference Framework for LLM-driven PDE Solver Generationcited by 37
  13. 2025CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Taskscited by 32
  14. 2024UPS: Efficiently Building Foundation Models for PDE Solving via Cross-Modal Adaptationcited by 27
  15. 2025PDE-Controller: LLMs for Autoformalization and Reasoning of PDEscited by 23
  16. 2025Enhancing Physics-Informed Neural Networks Through Feature Engineeringcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OpInf-LLM: Parametric PDE Solving with LLMs via Operator Inference
  2. 2025Automated Code Development for PDE Solvers Using Large Language Models
  3. 2025Towards Reasoning for PDE Foundation Models: A Reward-Model-Driven Inference-Time-Scaling Algorithm
  4. 2026AutoPDEBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Research for Neural PDE Solver Design
  5. 2025PDE-Agent: A toolchain-augmented multi-agent framework for PDE solving
  6. 2025Physics-Informed Inference Time Scaling for Solving High-Dimensional PDE via Defect Correction
  7. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Physics: Post-training LLMs with Continuous Rewards
  8. 2026AutoNumerics: An Autonomous, PDE-Agnostic Multi-Agent Pipeline for Scientific Computing