mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoPDE: Reliable Agentic PDE Solving via Explicitly Represented Solver Strategies

arXiv 2606.10752 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) are core computational tools in science and engineering. Building reliable PDE solvers requires not only executable code, but a numerical solver strategy, a set of decisions about discretization, stabilization, solver configuration, and resolution control, that matches the PDE structure. Recent LLM-based coding agents have begun to reduce the programming burden by generating and debugging solver implementations. However, they typically move directly from a PDE problem to solver code, leaving the solver strategy implicit in implementation details. Feedback from a failed solve is therefore routed back to code edits rather than to the underlying strategy, so numerical decisions remain hard to check before code is generated and hard to revise using numerical evidence when it fails. To address this limitation, we propose AutoPDE, a code agent that maintains the solver strategy as an explicitly represented object throughout the solving process: an independent, inspectable object that is built before any code is written and can be revised, using numerical evidence, whenever a solve fails. AutoPDE builds and maintains this object in three stages, all drawing from a library of reusable PDE-solving skills: PDE analysis identifies the equation type and algebraic structure; numerical method selection chooses a numerical method that matches the analysis result and commits to a discretization, stabilization, and linear solver accordingly; and adaptive tuning runs low-cost pilot solves to calibrate resolution and tolerances under the prescribed accuracy and runtime budget. We evaluate AutoPDE on the PDE Agent Bench, where experimental results show that AutoPDE achieves a pass rate of 54.5%, improving over the strongest baseline by 14.2 percentage points.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AutoNumerics: An Autonomous, PDE-Agnostic Multi-Agent Pipeline for Scientific Computing19 Feb

Other references · 8

  1. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  2. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  4. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  5. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  6. 2025CodePDE: An Inference Framework for LLM-driven PDE Solver Generationcited by 37
  7. 2025PDE-Controller: LLMs for Autoformalization and Reasoning of PDEscited by 23
  8. 2025PDE-SHARP: PDE Solver Hybrids through Analysis and Refinement Passescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AutoPDEBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Research for Neural PDE Solver Design
  2. 2025Automated Code Development for PDE Solvers Using Large Language Models
  3. 2025PDE-Agent: A toolchain-augmented multi-agent framework for PDE solving
  4. 2026DiffPDE: Masked Diffusion Language Models as PDE Solver
  5. 2026PDEFlow: Autonomous Agentic PDE Pipelines for Neural Operator Learning and Solver-Free Inference
  6. 2026OpInf-LLM: Parametric PDE Solving with LLMs via Operator Inference
  7. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Physics: Post-training LLMs with Continuous Rewards
  8. 2026Formalizing Numerical Analysis: An Agent Pipeline and Quality Audit Beyond Kernel Acceptance