On the Fundamental Limitations of Decentralized Learnable Reward Shaping in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in learnable reward shaping have shown promise in single-agent reinforcement learning by automatically discovering effective feedback signals. However, the effectiveness of decentralized learnable reward shaping in cooperative multi-agent settings remains poorly understood. We propose DMARL-RSA, a fully decentralized system where each agent learns individual reward shaping, and evaluate it on cooperative navigation tasks in the simple_spread_v3 environment. Despite sophisticated reward learning, DMARL-RSA achieves only -24.20 +/- 0.09 average reward, compared to MAPPO with centralized training at 1.92 +/- 0.87 -- a 26.12-point gap. DMARL-RSA performs similarly to simple independent learning (IPPO: -23.19 +/- 0.96), indicating that advanced reward shaping cannot overcome fundamental decentralized coordination limitations. Interestingly, decentralized methods achieve higher landmark coverage (0.888 +/- 0.029 for DMARL-RSA, 0.960 +/- 0.045 for IPPO out of 3 total) but worse overall performance than centralized MAPPO (0.273 +/- 0.008 landmark coverage) -- revealing a coordination paradox between local optimization and global performance. Analysis identifies three critical barriers: (1) non-stationarity from concurrent policy updates, (2) exponential credit assignment complexity, and (3) misalignment between individual reward optimization and global objectives. These results establish empirical limits for decentralized reward learning and underscore the necessity of centralized coordination for effective multi-agent cooperation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
References · 10
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
- 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
- 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 175
- 2019Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
- 2021Continuous Coordination As a Realistic Scenario for Lifelong Learningcited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Joint Optimization of Multi-agent Memory Systemcited by 1
- 2026Joint Optimization of Multi-agent Memory System13 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Centralized Reward Agent for Knowledge Sharing and Transfer in Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Fully Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
- 2025A Survey of Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning: Federated Learning and Cooperative and Noncooperative Decentralized Regimes
- 2026ARMS: Automatic Reward Shaping for Sparse-Reward Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2019Decentralized Multi-Agents by Imitation of a Centralized Controller
- 2024Joint Intrinsic Motivation for Coordinated Exploration in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Fully Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning is A Context Modeling Problem
- 2022Decentralized Policy Optimization