Feature-Guided SAE Steering for Refusal-Rate Control using Contrasting Prompts
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Steering and probing for LLM safety
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM) deployment requires guiding the LLM to recognize and not answer unsafe prompts while complying with safe prompts. Previous methods for achieving this require adjusting model weights along with other expensive procedures. While recent advances in Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have enabled interpretable feature extraction from LLMs, existing approaches lack systematic feature selection methods and principled evaluation of safety-utility tradeoffs. We explored using different steering features and steering strengths using Sparse Auto Encoders (SAEs) to provide a solution. Using an accurate and innovative contrasting prompt method with the AI-Generated Prompts Dataset from teknium/OpenHermes-2p5-Mistral-7B and Air Bench eu-dataset to efficiently choose the best features in the model to steer, we tested this method on Llama-3 8B. We conclude that using this method, our approach achieves an 18.9% improvement in safety performance while simultaneously increasing utility by 11.1%, demonstrating that targeted SAE steering can overcome traditional safety-utility tradeoffs when optimal features are identified through principled selection methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Steering and probing for LLM safety, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2025.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Controlcited by 86
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2024AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policiescited by 74
- 2024Investigating Layer Importance in Large Language Modelscited by 36
1 more
- 2024Understanding Layer Significance in LLM Alignmentcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026REINS: Refusal-Enhanced Inhibitory Steering with Sparse Autoencoder Features
- 2025Graph-Regularized Sparse Autoencoders for LLM Safety Steering
- 2026When Are Sparse Feature Interventions Actually Localized? Matched Evaluation for SAE-Based Safety Control
- 2025Enhancing LLM Steering through Sparse Autoencoder-Based Vector Refinement
- 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms
- 2026Steering LLMs? Actually, Sparse Autoencoders can outperform simple baselines
- 2026Pre-Intervention Prediction of Sparse Autoencoder Steering Side Effects