mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Regularization Terms Make Invertible Neural Networks Bayesian Point Estimators

arXiv 2510.26704 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can regularization terms in the training of invertible neural networks lead to known Bayesian point estimators in reconstruction? Invertible networks are attractive for inverse problems due to their inherent stability and interpretability. Recently, optimization strategies for invertible neural networks that approximate either a reconstruction map or the forward operator have been studied from a Bayesian perspective, but each has limitations. To address this, we introduce and analyze two regularization terms for the network training that, upon inversion of the network, recover properties of classical Bayesian point estimators: while the first can be connected to the posterior mean, the second resembles the MAP estimator. Our theoretical analysis characterizes how each loss shapes both the learned forward operator and its inverse reconstruction map. Numerical experiments support our findings and demonstrate how these loss-term regularizers introduce data-dependence in a stable and interpretable way.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  2. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  3. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  4. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  5. 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
  6. 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
  7. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
  8. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 242
  9. 2023Inversion by Direct Iteration: An Alternative to Denoising Diffusion for Image Restorationcited by 165
  10. 2017Learning Proximal Operators: Using Denoising Networks for Regularizing Inverse Imaging Problemscited by 107
  11. 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
  12. 2019Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing Flowscited by 76
6 more
  1. 2020Understanding and Mitigating Exploding Inverses in Invertible Neural Networkscited by 71
  2. 2020Composing Normalizing Flows for Inverse Problemscited by 48
  3. 2020Solving inverse problems using conditional invertible neural networkscited by 37
  4. 2022Semi-supervised Invertible Neural Operators for Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 25
  5. 2021Conditional Invertible Neural Networks for Medical Imagingcited by 19
  6. 2024Invertible ResNets for Inverse Imaging Problems: Competitive Performance with Provable Regularization Propertiescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.