mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RCScore: Quantifying Response Consistency in Large Language Models

arXiv 2510.26193 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current LLM evaluations often rely on a single instruction template, overlooking models' sensitivity to instruction style-a critical aspect for real-world deployments. We present RCScore, a multi-dimensional framework quantifying how instruction formulation affects model responses. By systematically transforming benchmark problems into multiple instruction styles, RCScore reveals performance variations undetected by conventional metrics. Our experiments across ten LLMs on four reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that instruction style can shift accuracy by up to 16.7% points. We introduce Cross-Response Similarity (CRS), a method applying RCScore metrics to measure stylistic self-consistency, and establish its strong correlation with task accuracy, suggesting consistency as a valuable proxy for model reliability. Additional findings show that deterministic decoding produces more stylistically stable outputs, and model scale correlates positively with cross-style consistency. RCScore offers a principled approach to assess instruction robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.

Builds on

29 of 44 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  12. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
17 more
  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  2. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  3. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  4. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  5. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  6. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  7. 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 299
  8. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 259
  9. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
  10. 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 132
  11. 2024What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs' Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineeringcited by 88
  12. 2025Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineeringcited by 64
  13. 2023The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?cited by 43
  14. 2023How are Prompts Different in Terms of Sensitivity?cited by 34
  15. 2024Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphscited by 32
  16. 2025Brains vs. Bytes: Evaluating LLM Proficiency in Olympiad Mathematicscited by 22
  17. 2024Paraphrase Types Elicit Prompt Engineering Capabilitiescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment
  2. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  3. 2024Does Instruction Tuning Make LLMs More Consistent?
  4. 2025MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuning
  5. 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
  6. 2023FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models
  7. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructions
  8. 2026Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Instruction-Induction Conflict in LLMs