SIRAJ: Diverse and Efficient Red-Teaming for LLM Agents via Distilled Structured Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability of LLM agents to plan and invoke tools exposes them to new safety risks, making a comprehensive red-teaming system crucial for discovering vulnerabilities and ensuring their safe deployment. We present SIRAJ: a generic red-teaming framework for arbitrary black-box LLM agents. We employ a dynamic two-step process that starts with an agent definition and generates diverse seed test cases that cover various risk outcomes, tool-use trajectories, and risk sources. Then, it iteratively constructs and refines model-based adversarial attacks based on the execution trajectories of former attempts. To optimize the red-teaming cost, we present a model distillation approach that leverages structured forms of a teacher model's reasoning to train smaller models that are equally effective. Across diverse evaluation agent settings, our seed test case generation approach yields 2 -- 2.5x boost to the coverage of risk outcomes and tool-calling trajectories. Our distilled 8B red-teamer model improves attack success rate by 100%, surpassing the 671B Deepseek-R1 model. Our ablations and analyses validate the effectiveness of the iterative framework, structured reasoning, and the generalization of our red-teamer models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
22 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents9 May
- 2025UDora: A Unified Red Teaming Framework against LLM Agents by Dynamically Hijacking Their Own Reasoning28 Feb
Other references · 20
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agentscited by 476
- 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 406
- 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agentscited by 280
- 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMscited by 185
- 2023MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teamingcited by 161
- 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agentscited by 129
- 2024Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-upscited by 112
8 more
- 2025SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agentscited by 97
- 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safetycited by 71
- 2024AdvAgent: Controllable Blackbox Red-teaming on Web Agentscited by 57
- 2025AutoRedTeamer: Autonomous Red Teaming with Lifelong Attack Integrationcited by 38
- 2025RiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use Agentscited by 34
- 2024Diverse and Effective Red Teaming with Auto-generated Rewards and Multi-step Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2025Jailbreak-R1: Exploring the Jailbreak Capabilities of LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2025Auto-RT: Automatic Jailbreak Strategy Exploration for Red-Teaming Large Language Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026SafePro: Evaluating the Safety of Professional-Level AI Agentscited by 10
- 2026T-MAP: Red-Teaming LLM Agents with Trajectory-aware Evolutionary Searchcited by 6
- 2026Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safetycited by 2
- 2026PI-Hunter: Automated Red-Teaming for Exposing and Localizing Prompt Injectionscited by 1
- 2026Attack Success Rate Is Not a Number: On Measurement Validity in Agentic AI Security Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Attack Success Rate Is Not a Number: On Measurement Validity in Agentic AI Security Evaluation21 Sep 2026
- 2026PI-Hunter: Automated Red-Teaming for Exposing and Localizing Prompt Injections10 Jun 2026
- 2026T-MAP: Red-Teaming LLM Agents with Trajectory-aware Evolutionary Search21 Mar 2026
- 2026Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety18 Mar 2026
- 2026SafePro: Evaluating the Safety of Professional-Level AI Agents10 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems
- 2026GPT-Red: Automated Red Teaming via Self-Play at Scale
- 2026OpenRT: An Open-Source Red Teaming Framework for Multimodal LLMs
- 2025ARMs: Adaptive Red-Teaming Agent against Multimodal Models with Plug-and-Play Attacks
- 2026Black-Box Red Teaming of Agentic AI: A Taxonomy-Driven Framework for Automated Risk Discovery
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases
- 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester
- 2026Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents