mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection

arXiv 2510.25799 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Human experts often struggle to select the best option from a large set of items with multiple competing objectives, a process bottlenecked by the difficulty of formalizing complex, implicit preferences. To address this, we introduce LISTEN (LLM-based Iterative Selection with Trade-off Evaluation from Natural-language), an agentic LLM-based framework that treats the LLM as a decision-making agent capable of iteratively refining its internal preference model and taking actions (e.g., proposing utilities or selecting candidates) to maximize alignment with a user's implicit goals. To operate within LLM constraints like context windows and inference costs, we propose two iterative algorithms: LISTEN-U, which uses the LLM to refine a parametric utility function, and LISTEN-T, a non-parametric method that performs tournament-style selections over small batches of solutions. Evaluated on diverse tasks including flight booking, shopping, and exam scheduling, our results show LISTEN-U excels when preferences are parametrically aligned (a property we measure with a novel concordance metric), while LISTEN-T offers more robust performance overall. This work explores a promising direction for steering complex multi-objective decisions directly with natural language, reducing the cognitive burden of traditional preference elicitation. Code is available at https://github.com/AdamJovine/LISTEN; data is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/AdamJovine/LISTEN-benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

21 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 20

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
  5. 2023NL4Opt Competition: Formulating Optimization Problems Based on Their Natural Language Descriptionscited by 135
  6. 2024ORLM: A Customizable Framework in Training Large Models for Automated Optimization Modelingcited by 124
  7. 2024OptiMUS: Scalable Optimization Modeling with (MI)LP Solvers and Large Language Modelscited by 109
  8. 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 76
  9. 2023OptiMUS: Optimization Modeling Using MIP Solvers and large language modelscited by 39
  10. 2024Take Caution in Using LLMs as Human Surrogates: Scylla Ex Machinacited by 29
  11. 2023"I Want It That Way": Enabling Interactive Decision Support Using Large Language Models and Constraint Programmingcited by 19
  12. 2024Bayesian Optimization with LLM-Based Acquisition Functions for Natural Language Preference Elicitationcited by 17
8 more
  1. 2023Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learningcited by 13
  2. 2024Aligning with Logic: Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Logical Preference Consistency in Large Language Modelscited by 12
  3. 2025LLM-based User Profile Management for Recommender Systemcited by 10
  4. 2024LLMs for Cold-Start Cutting Plane Separator Configurationcited by 8
  5. 2025DualSchool: How Reliable are LLMs for Optimization Education?cited by 4
  6. 2024Cornell University Uses Integer Programming to Optimize Final Exam Schedulingcited by 2
  7. 2025Bayesian preference elicitation for decision support in multiobjective optimizationcited by 2
  8. 2025LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment
  2. 2025Investigating Non-Transitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge
  3. 2026MINT: Min-Selection Preference Distillation for Balanced Multi-Objective Alignment
  4. 2025Leveraging LLMs as Meta-Judges: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating LLM Judgments
  5. 2025Multi-Objective Preference Optimization: Improving Human Alignment of Generative Models
  6. 2025LLM Agents Are Hypersensitive to Nudges
  7. 2025Chunks as Arms: Multi-Armed Bandit-Guided Sampling for Long-Context LLM Preference Optimization
  8. 2025LLM-Powered Preference Elicitation in Combinatorial Assignment