mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Process-Level Trajectory Evaluation for Environment Configuration in Software Engineering Agents

arXiv 2510.25694 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 17

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model-based agents show promise for software engineering, but environment configuration remains a bottleneck due to heavy manual effort and scarce large-scale, high-quality datasets. Existing benchmarks assess only end-to-end build/test success, obscuring where and why agents succeed or fail. We introduce the Environment Configuration Diagnosis Benchmark, Enconda-bench, which provides process-level trajectory assessment of fine-grained agent capabilities during environment setup-planning, perception-driven error diagnosis, feedback-driven repair, and action to execute final environment configuration. Our task instances are automatically constructed by injecting realistic README errors and are validated in Docker for scalable, high-quality evaluation. Enconda-bench combines process-level analysis with end-to-end executability to enable capability assessments beyond aggregate success rates. Evaluations across state-of-the-art LLMs and agent frameworks show that while agents can localize errors, they struggle to translate feedback into effective corrections, limiting end-to-end performance. To our knowledge, Enconda-bench is the first framework to provide process-level internal capability assessment for environment configuration, offering actionable insights for improving software engineering agents.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

Builds on

17 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents30 Apr
  2. 2024You Name It, I Run It: An LLM Agent to Execute Tests of Arbitrary Projects13 Dec
  3. 2024Beyond pip install: Evaluating LLM Agents for the Automated Installation of Python Projects9 Dec
  4. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  5. 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents1 Jul
  6. 2024LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead7 Apr
  7. 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges14 Jan

Other references · 10

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  3. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  4. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
  5. 2023RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systemscited by 346
  6. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  7. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Survey and Open Problemscited by 178
  8. 2025EnvBench: A Benchmark for Automated Environment Setupcited by 36
  9. 2025Automated Benchmark Generation for Repository-Level Coding Taskscited by 27
  10. 2023FlaPy: Mining Flaky Python Tests at Scalecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 14.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarioscited by 49
  2. 2026SWE-Universe: Scale Real-World Verifiable Environments to Millionscited by 16
  3. 2026CodeTracer: Towards Traceable Agent Statescited by 11
  4. 2025Youtu-LLM: Unlocking the Native Agentic Potential for Lightweight Large Language Modelscited by 8
  5. 2025AdmTree: Compressing Lengthy Context with Adaptive Semantic Treescited by 7
  6. 2026EvoConfig: Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems for Efficient Autonomous Environment Configurationcited by 7
  7. 2026TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agentscited by 7
  8. 2026Cognitive Mismatch in Multimodal Large Language Models for Discrete Symbol Understandingcited by 6
  9. 2026DeployBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Research Artifact Deploymentcited by 6
  10. 2026What Resolve Rate Hides: Trajectory Structure Diagnostics for Coding Agentscited by 5
  11. 2026TangramPuzzle: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models with Compositional Spatial Reasoningcited by 3
  12. 2026MEnvAgent: Scalable Polyglot Environment Construction for Verifiable Software Engineeringcited by 3
5 more
  1. 2026Learning to Control LLM Agent Harnesses with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  2. 2026TopoAgent: A Self-Evolving Topological Agent for Multimodal Scientific Reasoningcited by 2
  3. 2026Self-Evolving Coding Agentscited by 2
  4. 2026AblateCell: A Reproduce-then-Ablate Agent for Virtual Cell Repositoriescited by 0
  5. 2026From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs' Agentic Mathematical Capabilitiescited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Benchmarks are Not Enough: RAMP for Runtime Assessing of Agentic Models in Production Systems
  2. 2025Multi-Docker-Eval: A `Shovel of the Gold Rush' Benchmark on Automatic Environment Building for Software Engineering
  3. 2026Efficient SWE Agent Benchmarking via Trajectory-Aware Evaluation
  4. 2026Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflows
  5. 2026Environment Maps: Structured Environmental Representations for Long-Horizon Agents
  6. 2025SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments
  7. 2026SWE-World: Building Software Engineering Agents in Docker-Free Environments
  8. 2026Code That Works, Environments That Don't: Measuring Environment Reproducibility in AI-Generated Software