ComboBench: Can LLMs Manipulate Physical Devices to Play Virtual Reality Games?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Virtual Reality (VR) games require players to translate high-level semantic actions into precise device manipulations using controllers and head-mounted displays (HMDs). While humans intuitively perform this translation based on common sense and embodied understanding, whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively replicate this ability remains underexplored. This paper introduces a benchmark, ComboBench, evaluating LLMs' capability to translate semantic actions into VR device manipulation sequences across 262 scenarios from four popular VR games: Half-Life: Alyx, Into the Radius, Moss: Book II, and Vivecraft. We evaluate seven LLMs, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, LLaMA-3-8B, Mixtral-8x7B, and GLM-4-Flash, compared against annotated ground truth and human performance. Our results reveal that while top-performing models like Gemini-1.5-Pro demonstrate strong task decomposition capabilities, they still struggle with procedural reasoning and spatial understanding compared to humans. Performance varies significantly across games, suggesting sensitivity to interaction complexity. Few-shot examples substantially improve performance, indicating potential for targeted enhancement of LLMs' VR manipulation capabilities. We release all materials at https://sites.google.com/view/combobench.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.
Builds on
27 of 36 references.
References · 27
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
15 more
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 783
- 2021CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 584
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2022MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledgecited by 478
- 2022ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?cited by 327
- 2024VLABench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Robotics Manipulation with Long-Horizon Reasoning Taskscited by 175
- 2021AndroidEnv: A Reinforcement Learning Platform for Androidcited by 90
- 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluationcited by 81
- 2024UniDebugger: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Unified Software Debuggingcited by 35
- 2023MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers?cited by 34
- 2024A little less conversation, a little more action, please: Investigating the physical common-sense of LLMs in a 3D embodied environmentcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.